terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 AROMA ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL SFORZATO DI VALTELLINA WINES BYINSTRUMENTAL AND SENSORY METHODOLOGIES

AROMA ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL SFORZATO DI VALTELLINA WINES BYINSTRUMENTAL AND SENSORY METHODOLOGIES

Abstract

Sforzato di Valtellina DOCG is a special dry red wine produced from partially dehydrated Nebbiolo wine-grapes growing in the Rhaetian Alps valley of Valtellina (Lombardy, Italy). Valtellina terraced vineyards are located at an altitude of 350–800 m according to ‘heroic’ viticulture on steep slopes. The harvested grape bunches are naturally dehydrated indoors, where a slow and continuous withering occurs (about 20% w/w of weight loss), until at least 1st December when the grapes reach the desired sugar content and can be processed following a normal winemaking with maceration. The wines can be marketed only after 20 months of aging, of which at least 12 in wood. Despite the increasing economic importance, few studies have been published on Sforzato di Valtellina wine and to our knowledge none on volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

In this study, VOCs of Sforzato di Valtellina wine were determined by HS–SPME–GC–MS. Sensory analysis was also performed by QDA and CATA methodologies with the aim of establishing correlations between VOCs content and perceived aroma intensity and descriptors. Thirty-two wines were analyzed in 2021 from two consecutive vintages (17 wines of 2016 and 15 wines of 2017), representing wineries producing 90% by volume of this denomination.

In addition to fermentative VOCs (mainly ethyl esters and some acids), terpenes and norisoprenoids were found in contents that could potentially contribute to the aroma of Sforzato di Valtellina wines. The 2016 wines were significantly richer in total VOCs than 2017 ones, particularly regarding total norisoprenoids and fermentative esters. This result was confirmed also in sensory analysis, with 2016 wines having higher aroma intensity than 2017 ones. Despite the variability found among the wines analyzed for each vintage, some differences were reported in the contents of single compounds: vitispirane and TDN (norisoprenoids), β-pinene and linalool (terpenes), diethyl malate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate and methyl octanoate (esters), and hexanoic and octanoic acids (volatile acids). During aging, some compounds can be formed through chemical reactions depending on wine composition and storage conditions. These reactions include ester hydrolysis and formation (associated to fruity-related descriptors), hydrolysis of non-volatile glycoside precursors and chemical rearrangements of norisoprenoids and monoterpenes promoting balsamic-type descriptors, associated here mainly to vitispirane and β-pinene. Acknowledgments: Funded by PSR 2014-2020 Regione Lombardia (Italy) project no. 201901320242. We thank the Consorzio di Tutela dei Vini di Valtellina and Coldiretti Sondrio (Sondrio, Italy) for supplying the wines.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Susana Río Segade¹, Maria Alessandra Paissoni¹, Domen Skrab¹, Simone Giacosa¹, Luca Rolle¹, Vincenzo Gerbi¹

1. University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Corso Enotria 2/C, 12051 Alba (CN), Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

volatile compounds, sensory analysis, Sforzato di Valtellina, red wine

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

WINE SWIRLING: A FIRST STEP TOWARDS THE UNLOCKING OF THE WINE’STASTER GESTURE

Right after the pouring of wine in a glass, a myriad of volatile organic compounds, including ethanol, overwhelm the glass headspace, thus causing the so-called wine’s bouquet [1]. Otherwise, it is worth noting that during wine tasting, most people automatically swirl their glass to enhance the release of aromas in the glass headspace [1]. About a decade ago, Swiss researchers revealed the complex fluid mechanics underlying wine swirling [2]. However, despite mechanically repeated throughout wine tasting, the consequences of glass swirling on the chemical space found in the headspace of wine glasses are still barely known.

CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK TO PREDICT GENETIC GROUP AND SULFUR TOLERANCE OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.20.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

RED WINE AGING THROUGH 1H-NMR METABOLOMICS

Premium red wines are often aged in oak barrel. This widespread winemaking process is used, among others, to provide roundness and complexity to the wine. The study of wine evolution during barrel aging is crucial to better ensure control of wine quality.
¹H-NMR has already been proved to be an efficient tool to monitor winemaking process [1]. Indeed, it is a non-destructive technique, it requires a small amount of sample and a short time of analysis, yet it provides clues about several chemical families.

SENSORY CHARACTERIZATION OF COGNAC EAUX-DE-VIE AGED IN BARRELS REPRESENTING DIFFERENT TOASTING PROCESS

Cognac is an outstanding french wine spirit appreciated around the world and produced exclusively in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region, and more precisely in the Cognac area. According to AOC regulations (Appellation D’origine Controlée), the spirit required at least 2 years of continuous ageing in oak barrels to be granted the title of Cognac. The oak wood will import color, structure and organoleptic complexity. The different steps during barrel-making process, such as seasoning and toasting, influence the above quality attributes in both wines and spirits.

SENSORY PROPERTIES IMPORTANT TO AUSTRALIAN FINE WINE CONSUMER SEGMENT PERCEPTION OF CHARDONNAY WINE COMPLEXITY AND PREFERENCE

Wine complexity is considered a multidimensional yet equivocal sensory percept. This project uncovered sensory attributes Australian Chardonnay wine consumers associate with Chardonnay wine complexity
and correlations between expert and consumer perceived wine complexity and preference. A
wine consumer test examined 6 Australian Chardonnay wines of three complexity levels designated low (LC1&2), medium (MC1&2), and high (HC1&2) by an expert panel (n = 8) using a benchtop sensory task. Consumers (n = 81) rated their perceived liking using a 9-point hedonic scale; wine complexity with a 5-point scale anchored “low”, “low-medium”, “medium”, “medium-high”, and “high” and lastly, profiled the wines using Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA). Psychographic segmentation with the Fine Wine Instrument
(FWI) generated three segments; Wine Enthusiasts (WE n=29), Aspirants (ASP n=40) and No- Frills (NF n=12).