terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

Abstract

Grape pomace is one of the main by-products generated after pressing in winemaking.Emerging methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction with eutectic mixtures, have great potential due to their low toxicity, and high biodegradability. Choline chloride (ChCl) was used as a hydrogen bond acceptor and its corresponding hydrogen bond donor (malic acid, citric acid, and glycerol: urea). Components were heated at 80 °C and stirred until a clear liquid was obtained. Distilled water was added (30 % v/v). A solid-liquid ratio of 1 g pomace per 10 ml of eutectic solvent was used. Total anthocyanins were determined. Malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was quantified by HPLC. Metabisulfite bleaching and the viscosity of the extracts were also determined. The highest extraction was obtained for the methanol/water system.The eutectic system that showed the highest extraction was the mixture of choline chloride, urea, and glycerol in a molar ratio of 1:1:1. Glycerol is classified as a polyol. It can modify the polarity of water so it can be used as a co-solvent in the extraction of polyphenols. In addition, it is considered a highly flexible molecule, capable of forming intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds [1]. The higher extraction of choline chloride glycerol and urea (molar ratio 1:1:1) could be due to the influence of the lower polarity of glycerol presenting a higher affinity, probably with malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, which is less polar than Mv-3-O-glc. In HPLC analysis, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was the main anthocyanin identified in all extracts.In eutectic mixtures, viscosity is the property that limits the extraction process compared to conventional solvent extractions. The extract obtained with the choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:2:2) system had the lowest viscosity values, while the rest of the extracts presented higher viscosities. Viscosity reflects how compact a molecular structure is. Therefore, it can be inferred that the systems with malic acid and citric acid with choline chloride in molar ratios 1:2 present a compact molecular structure with a minimum of holes, which results in less diffusion during the extraction process. The choline chloride: malic acid (1:1) system presented significant resistance to sulfite bleaching at pH 3.5, losing approximately 34 % of color. The choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:1:1) system lost approximately 50 % of the color, presenting a lower resistance to discoloration.

1. A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris, K. S. Ryder, C. D’Agostino, L. F. Gladden, and M. D. Mantle, “Glycerol eutectics as sustainable solvent systems,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2011

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Lilisbet Castellanos-Gallo¹, Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias¹, Jose-Carlos Espinoza-Hicks¹,  Johan Mendo-Za-Chacón¹, León Hernandez-Ochoa¹

1. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, C.P. 31170 Chihuahua Mexico

Contact the author*

Keywords

Extraction, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, Eutectic solvents, Grape pomace

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

IMPACT OF ACIDIFICATION AT BOTTLING BY FUMARIC ACID ON RED WINE AFTER 2 YEARS

Global warming is responsible for a lack of organic acid in grape berries, leading to wines with higher pH and lower titrable acidity. The chemical, microbiological and organoleptic equilibriums are impacted by this change of organic acid concentration. It is common practice to acidify the wine in order to prevent these imbalances that can lead to wine defects and early spoilage. Tartaric acid (TA) is most commonly used by winemaker for wine acidification purposes. Fumaric acid (FA), which is authorized by the OIV in its member states for the inhibition of malolactic fermentation, could also be used as a potential acidification candidate since it has a better acidifying power than tartaric acid.

INOCULATION OF THE SELECTED METSCHNIKOWIA PULCHERRIMA MP1 AS A BIOPROTECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO SULFITES TO PREVENT BROWNING OF WHITE GRAPE MUST

Enzymatic browning (BE) of must is caused by polyphenol oxidases (PPOs), tyrosinase and laccase. Both PPOs can oxidize diphenols such as hydroxycinnamic acids (HA) to quinones, which can later polymerize to form melanins [1], which are responsible of BE in white wines and of oxidasic haze in red wines. SO₂ is the main tool used to protect must from BE thanks to its capacity to inhibit PPOs [2]. However, the current trend in winemaking is to reduce and even eliminate this unfriendly additive. Among the different possible alternatives for protecting must against BE, the inoculation with a selected Metschnikowia pulcherrima MP1 is without any doubt one of the most promising ones.

‘TROPICAL’ POLYFUNCTIONAL THIOLS AND THEIR ROLE IN AUSTRALIAN RED WINES

Following anecdotal evidence of unwanted ‘tropical’ character in red wines resulting from vineyard interventions and a subsequent yeast trial observing higher ‘red fruit’ character correlated with higher thiol concentrations, the role of polyfunctional thiols in commercial Australian red wines was investigated.
First, trials into the known tropical thiol modulation technique of foliar applications of sulfur and urea were conducted in parallel on Chardonnay and Shiraz.1 The Chardonnay wines showed expected results with elevated concentrations of 3-sulfanylhexanol (3-SH) and 3-sulfanylhexyl acetate (3-SHA), whereas the Shiraz wines lacked 3-SHA. Furthermore, the Shiraz wines were described as ‘drain’ (known as ‘reductive’ aroma character) during sensory evaluation although they did not contain thiols traditionally associated with ‘reductive’ thiols (H2S, methanethiol etc.).

PROGRESS OF STUDIES OF LEES ORIGINATING FROM THE FIRST ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION OF CHAMPAGNE WINES

Champagne wines are produced via a two-step process: the first is an initial alcoholic fermentation of grape must that produces a still base wine, followed by a second fermentation in bottle – the prise de mousse – that produces the effervescence. This appellation produces non-vintage sparkling wines composed of still base wines assembled from different vintages, varieties, and regions. These base wines, or “reserve wines,” are typically conserved on their fine lies and used to compensate for quality variance between vintages (1). Continuously blending small amounts of these reserve wines into newer ones also facilitates preserving the producer’s “house style.”

WHAT’S FUTURE FOR SANTORINI’S VITICULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE

The own-rooted vineyard of Santorini is a unique case of vineyard worldwide that is been cultivated for thousands of years. On the island’s volcanic soil, the vines are still cultivated with traditional techniques, which are adapted to the specific and extreme weather conditions that prevail on it. While climate change is a reality in the Mediterranean region, will Santorini vineyard endure its impact? The study of the traditional training systems, techniques and vine density, as well as the application of sustainable solutions (cover crops and use of kaolin etc.) revealed sustainable methods for the adaptation of the local viticulture to new climatic phenomena that tend to be more and more frequent in the region due to climate change.