terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

Abstract

Grape pomace is one of the main by-products generated after pressing in winemaking.Emerging methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction with eutectic mixtures, have great potential due to their low toxicity, and high biodegradability. Choline chloride (ChCl) was used as a hydrogen bond acceptor and its corresponding hydrogen bond donor (malic acid, citric acid, and glycerol: urea). Components were heated at 80 °C and stirred until a clear liquid was obtained. Distilled water was added (30 % v/v). A solid-liquid ratio of 1 g pomace per 10 ml of eutectic solvent was used. Total anthocyanins were determined. Malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was quantified by HPLC. Metabisulfite bleaching and the viscosity of the extracts were also determined. The highest extraction was obtained for the methanol/water system.The eutectic system that showed the highest extraction was the mixture of choline chloride, urea, and glycerol in a molar ratio of 1:1:1. Glycerol is classified as a polyol. It can modify the polarity of water so it can be used as a co-solvent in the extraction of polyphenols. In addition, it is considered a highly flexible molecule, capable of forming intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds [1]. The higher extraction of choline chloride glycerol and urea (molar ratio 1:1:1) could be due to the influence of the lower polarity of glycerol presenting a higher affinity, probably with malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, which is less polar than Mv-3-O-glc. In HPLC analysis, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was the main anthocyanin identified in all extracts.In eutectic mixtures, viscosity is the property that limits the extraction process compared to conventional solvent extractions. The extract obtained with the choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:2:2) system had the lowest viscosity values, while the rest of the extracts presented higher viscosities. Viscosity reflects how compact a molecular structure is. Therefore, it can be inferred that the systems with malic acid and citric acid with choline chloride in molar ratios 1:2 present a compact molecular structure with a minimum of holes, which results in less diffusion during the extraction process. The choline chloride: malic acid (1:1) system presented significant resistance to sulfite bleaching at pH 3.5, losing approximately 34 % of color. The choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:1:1) system lost approximately 50 % of the color, presenting a lower resistance to discoloration.

1. A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris, K. S. Ryder, C. D’Agostino, L. F. Gladden, and M. D. Mantle, “Glycerol eutectics as sustainable solvent systems,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2011

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Lilisbet Castellanos-Gallo¹, Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias¹, Jose-Carlos Espinoza-Hicks¹,  Johan Mendo-Za-Chacón¹, León Hernandez-Ochoa¹

1. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, C.P. 31170 Chihuahua Mexico

Contact the author*

Keywords

Extraction, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, Eutectic solvents, Grape pomace

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

DETERMINATION OF FREE AMINO ACIDS, AMINO ACID POTENTIAL AND PROTEASE ACTIVITY IN THE LEES AND STILL WINES OF CHAMPAGNE

Prior to winemaking, organic or mineral nitrogen compound concentrations are usually measured in the vineyard and in grape musts. These indicators facilitate vine cultivation decisions, usually through yield or vigor. During vinification, yeast and bacteria metabolize nitrogen compounds in the musts in order to generate biomass. After fermentation, the microorganisms rerelease a part of this nitrogen as soluble compounds into the wines. Another part remains bound in the lees and can be lost during racking. The must’s natural nitrogen quantities, additional supplements during fermentation, and lees contact management enhance the release of nitrogen compounds to the wines. During ageing these nitrogen compounds – primarily the amino acids – are implicated in the generation of odorous compounds such as heterocycles(1).

NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE FATE OF MARKERS INVOLVED IN FRESH MUSHROOM OFF-FLAVOURS DURING ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION

The fresh mushroom off-flavour (FMOff) has been appearing in wines since the 2000s. Some C8 compounds such as 1-octen-3-one, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-hydroxyoctan-3-one, 3-octanol and others are involved in this specific off-flavour [1-3]. At the same time, glycosidic precursors of some FMOff compounds have been identified in musts contaminated by Crustomyces subabruptus [4], highlighting the role of aroma precursors in this specific taint. However, the fate of these volatile molecules and glycosidic fractions during fermentation is not well known.

IMPACT OF MINERAL AND ORGANIC NITROGEN ADDITION ON ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION WITH S. CEREVISIAE

During alcoholic fermentation, nitrogen is one of essential nutrient for yeast as it plays a key role in sugar transport and biosynthesis of and wine aromatic compounds (thiols, esters, higher alcohols). The main issue of a lack in yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) in winemaking is sluggish or stuck fermentations promoting the growth of alteration species and leads to economic losses. Currently, grape musts are often characterized by low YAN concentration and an increase of sugars concentration due to global warming, making alcoholic fermentations even more difficult. YAN depletion can be corrected by addition of inorganic (ammonia) or organic (yeast derivatives products) nitrogen during alcoholic fermentation.

WINE FERMENTATION METABOLITES PRODUCED BY TWO TORULASPORA DELBRUECKII STRAINS ISOLATED FROM OKANAGAN VALLEY, BC, CANADA VINEYARDS

Wine aroma is influenced by various factors, from agricultural practices in the vineyard to the enological choices made by winemakers throughout the vinification process. Spontaneous fermentations have a characteristically deeper complexity of aromas when compared to fermentations that have been inoculated with Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae because of the diversity of microflora naturally present on grape skins. Non-Saccharomyces yeast are being extensively studied for their ability to positively contribute to wine aroma and flavour. These yeasts are known to liberate more bound volatile compounds present in grape must than S. cerevisiae through the enzymatic action of β-glucosidases and β-lyases1.

EFFECT OF FUMARIC ACID ON SPONTANEOUS FERMENTATION IN GRAPE MUST

Malolactic fermentation (MLF)¹, the decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid, is performed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). MLF has a deacidifying effect that may compromise freshness or microbiological stability in wines² and can be inhibited by fumaric acid [E297] (FA). In wine, can be added at a maximum allowable dose of 0.6 g/L³. Its inhibition with FA is being studied as an alternative strategy to minimize added doses of SO₂⁴. In addition, wine yeasts are capable of metabolizing and storing small amounts of FA and during alcoholic fermentation (AF).