terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

ANTHOCYANINS EXTRACTION FROM GRAPE POMACE USING EUTECTIC SOLVENTS

Abstract

Grape pomace is one of the main by-products generated after pressing in winemaking.Emerging methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction with eutectic mixtures, have great potential due to their low toxicity, and high biodegradability. Choline chloride (ChCl) was used as a hydrogen bond acceptor and its corresponding hydrogen bond donor (malic acid, citric acid, and glycerol: urea). Components were heated at 80 °C and stirred until a clear liquid was obtained. Distilled water was added (30 % v/v). A solid-liquid ratio of 1 g pomace per 10 ml of eutectic solvent was used. Total anthocyanins were determined. Malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was quantified by HPLC. Metabisulfite bleaching and the viscosity of the extracts were also determined. The highest extraction was obtained for the methanol/water system.The eutectic system that showed the highest extraction was the mixture of choline chloride, urea, and glycerol in a molar ratio of 1:1:1. Glycerol is classified as a polyol. It can modify the polarity of water so it can be used as a co-solvent in the extraction of polyphenols. In addition, it is considered a highly flexible molecule, capable of forming intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds [1]. The higher extraction of choline chloride glycerol and urea (molar ratio 1:1:1) could be due to the influence of the lower polarity of glycerol presenting a higher affinity, probably with malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, which is less polar than Mv-3-O-glc. In HPLC analysis, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside was the main anthocyanin identified in all extracts.In eutectic mixtures, viscosity is the property that limits the extraction process compared to conventional solvent extractions. The extract obtained with the choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:2:2) system had the lowest viscosity values, while the rest of the extracts presented higher viscosities. Viscosity reflects how compact a molecular structure is. Therefore, it can be inferred that the systems with malic acid and citric acid with choline chloride in molar ratios 1:2 present a compact molecular structure with a minimum of holes, which results in less diffusion during the extraction process. The choline chloride: malic acid (1:1) system presented significant resistance to sulfite bleaching at pH 3.5, losing approximately 34 % of color. The choline chloride: urea: glycerol (1:1:1) system lost approximately 50 % of the color, presenting a lower resistance to discoloration.

1. A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris, K. S. Ryder, C. D’Agostino, L. F. Gladden, and M. D. Mantle, “Glycerol eutectics as sustainable solvent systems,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2011

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Lilisbet Castellanos-Gallo¹, Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias¹, Jose-Carlos Espinoza-Hicks¹,  Johan Mendo-Za-Chacón¹, León Hernandez-Ochoa¹

1. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, C.P. 31170 Chihuahua Mexico

Contact the author*

Keywords

Extraction, malvidin-3-O-coumaroylglucoside, Eutectic solvents, Grape pomace

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

EFFECTS OF LEAF REMOVAL AT DIFFERENT BUNCHES PHENOLOGICAL STAGES ON FREE AND GLYCOCONJUGATE AROMAS OF SKINS AND PULPS OF TWO ITALIAN RED GRAPES

Canopy-management practices are applied in viticulture to improve berries composition and quality, having a great impact on primary and secondary grape metabolism. Among these techniques, cluster zone leaf removal (defoliation) is widely used to manage air circulation, temperature and light radiation of grape bunches and close environment. Since volatiles are quantitatively and qualitatively influenced by the degree of fruit ripeness, the level of solar exposure, and the thermal environment in which grapes ripen, leaf removal has been shown to affect volatile composition of grape berries [1].

CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK TO PREDICT GENETIC GROUP AND SULFUR TOLERANCE OF BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.20.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

IN DEPTH CHARACTERIZATION OF OENOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO LACHANCEA THERMOTOLERANS STARTER STRAINS

Non-Saccharomyces starter cultures became increasingly popular over the years because of their potential to produce more distinctive and unique wines. The major benefit of the use of Lachancea thermotolerans as a fermentation starter is its ability to produce relevant amounts of lactic acid and reduce alcoholic strength, making it valuable for mitigating negative impacts of climate change on grapes and wine quality. Besides, like any other non-Saccharomyces yeast, L. thermotolerans can significantly affect a whole range of other physico-chemical wine parameters.

POTENTIAL OF PEPTIDASES FOR AVOIDING PROTEIN HAZES IN MUST AND WINE

Haze formation in wine during transportation and storage is an important issue for winemakers, since turbid wines are unacceptable for sale. Such haze often results from aggregation of unstable grape proteinaceous colloids. To date, foreseeably unstable wines need to be treated with bentonite to remove these, while excessive quantities, which are often required, affect the wine volume and quality (Cosme et al. 2020). One solution to avoid these drawbacks might be the use of peptidases. Marangon et al. (2012) reported that Aspergillopepsins I and II were able to hydrolyse the respective haze-relevant proteins in combination with a flash pasteurisation. In 2021, the OIV approved this enzymatic treatment for wine stabilisation (OIV-OENO 541A and 541B).

ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY OF INACTIVATED NON-SACCHAROMYCES YEASTS

The importance of the non-Saccharomyces yeasts (NSY) in winemaking has been extensively reviewed in the past for their aromatic or bioprotective capacity while, recently their antioxidant/antiradical potential has emerged under winemaking conditions. In the literature the antioxidant potential of NSY was solely explored through their capacity to improve glutathione (GSH) content during alcoholic fermen- tation [1], while more and more studies pointed out the activity of the non-glutathione soluble fraction released by yeasts [2].