GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Survey assessing different practices for mechanical winter pruning in Southern France vineyards

Survey assessing different practices for mechanical winter pruning in Southern France vineyards

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Winter pruning is today the longest operation for hand workers in the vineyard. Over the last years, mechanical pruning practices have become popular in southern France vineyards to respond to competitiveness issue especially for the basic and mid-range wine production. Wine farmers have developed different vineyard management techniques associated with mechanical winter pruning. They sought to be precise or not to control the buds number per vine. They maintained the vertical trellis system or grew the vine on a free cordon. They transformed the vineyard in minimal pruning system. The purpose of this survey was to assess a state of the practices in southern France vineyards, around 255 000 ha, which 2/3 are producing basic and mid-range wines.

Material and methods –  The survey was built on two steps. The first one was a qualitative follow-up with individual interviews on targeted winegrowers or cooperative’s technical managers who have been leaders in mechanical winter pruning development. These interviews allowed to build the second step survey. This second step consisted in a quantitative approach with an online questionnaire for winegrowers. It was composed by 43 to 63 closed-ended questions, with different fields such as farm characteristics, vineyard and soil management, vine-plot description and mechanical pruning operations. Statistical treatments were run with Addinsoft XLStat software.

Results – Results showed that there are three main mechanical pruning (mechaP) practices: a precise and a hedge mechaP, leaving lengths of branches respectively inferior or superior to 20 cm above the cordon line, and at last a minimal pruning system with few trimming operations on the canopy. Precise mechaP appears to be the most used technique with around 80% of the responses followed by the minimal pruning system, 15% of the responses, and the hedge mechaP with 5%. 56% of the estates are using mechanical pruning combined with trellised vertical shoot positioning (VSP) system, 22% with the free cordon system and 22% are using both systems.
Economic save is the main motivation to develop mechaP, due to the time save with winter pruning, followed by the difficulty to find handwork forces. The main gain observed by the producers due to mechaP is the increase and the regularity of the yield that impact positively the turnover per hectare. Finally, they consider that mechaP allows a better staff management due to time savings during the winter operations in the vineyard and a global increase of the economic value of the production.

DOI:

Publication date: March 11, 2024

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Thierry DUFOURCQ1,2, Elodie GASSIOLLE1, Denis CABOULET3, Thierry GRIMAL4, Bernard GENEVET6, Nathalie GOMA-FORTIN6, Christophe GAVIGLIO2

1 IFV Sud-Ouest, Château de Mons, 32100 Caussens, France
2 IFV Sud-Ouest, V’innopôle, 81 310 Lisle Sur Tarn, France
3 IFV Rhône-Méditerranée, Domaine de Pech Rouge, 11430 Gruissan, France.
4 Chambre d’Agriculture de l’Aude, Domaine de Cazes, 11240 Alaigne, France
5 Chambre d’Agriculture du Gard, Mas des Abeilles, 30900 Nîmes, France
6 Chambre d’Agriculture de l’Hérault, Mas de Saporta, 34970 Lattes, France

Contact the author

Keywords

survey, mechanical pruning, minimal pruning, southern France vineyard

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Influence of a spontaneous cover crop on the vineyard and soil erosion under Mediterranean climate

Sixty five % of the agricultural area of the Basque Country located in the DO Ca Rioja corresponds to vineyards. More than 40% of it has an average slope greater than 10%, which makes it sensitive to erosive processes. Furthermore, it is foreseeable that extreme weather events (storms, hail, extreme heat and cold, etc.) will be favored due to climate change. Cover cropping can mitigate this risk, and therefore the objective of this work is to evaluate the impact that a vegetable cover has on the agronomic behavior of the vineyard, the quality of the grape and soil erosion. For this, a trial has been carried out with a Graciano variety vineyard with a slope between 10% -20% during the years 2020 and 2021. Conventional tillage management in the area has been compared (4-6 passes per year of tillage machinery) versus spontaneous vegetation cover management in the vineyard. This implies not tilling and allowing the grass of the land to colonize the range between the lines of vines, controlling their height through 1-3 mowing passes per year, always trying to affect the surface of the land as little as possible. The vegetative growth, yield and quality of the grape and wine was measured. Furthermore, erosion has been measured using Gerlasch boxes. The yield was lower in the second year of the trial in the cover crop treatment, but erosion was significantly reduced.

Adaptation to soil and climate through the choice of plant material

Choosing the rootstock, the scion variety and the training system best suited to the local soil and climate are the key elements for an economically sustainable production of wine. The choice of the rootstock/scion variety best adapted to the characteristics of the soil is essential but, by changing climatic conditions, ongoing climate change disrupts the fine-tuned local equilibrium. Higher temperatures induce shifts in developmental stages, with on the one hand increasing fears of spring frost damages and, on the other hand, ripening during the warmest periods in summer. Expected higher water demand and longer and more frequent drought events are also major concerns. The genetic control of the phenotypes, by genomic information but also by the epigenetic control of gene expression, offers a lot of opportunities for adapting the plant material to the future. For complex traits, genomic selection is also a promising method for predicting phenotypes. However, ecophysiological modelling is necessary to better anticipate the phenotypes in unexplored climatic conditions Genetic approaches applied on parameters of ecophysiological models rather than raw observed data are more than ever the basis for finding, or building, the ideal varieties of the future.