Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Extraction of polyphenols from grape marc by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and evaluation of their ‘bioavailability’ as dietary supplements

Extraction of polyphenols from grape marc by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and evaluation of their ‘bioavailability’ as dietary supplements

Abstract

In the winemaking process, several compounds that remain in the grape skins and seeds after the fermentation stage are bioactive-compounds (substances with potential beneficial effects on health) that can be extracted in order to recovery valuable substances with a high commercial value for the cosmetic, food (nutraceuticals) and pharmaceutical industries. The skins contain significant amounts of bioactive substances such as tannins (16-27%) and other polyphenolic compounds (2-6.5%) in particular, catechins, anthocyanins, proanthocyanins, quercetin , ellagic acid and resveratrol. The seeds, in addition to oil, contain approximately 60% of the polyphenols present in grape, in particular an high concentration of flavan-3-ols, catechin and epicatechin. Grape seed extracts are very potent antioxidants and exhibit numerous interesting pharmacologic activities The traditional extraction methods used for polyphenols from solid or semi-solid materials have been focused on methods, which use organic solvents. These methods are laborious and time consuming, promote degradation reactions, have low selectivity and/or low extraction yields. Moreover, these conventional techniques employ large amounts of toxic solvents. Some of these critical points could be over boost with Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE). The most used solvent in extraction with supercritical fluids is the CO2, which is economical, safe, non-toxic (it does not leave residues in extract) and reaches supercritical conditions easily (32°C and 74 bar). It is suitable for thermo-labile substances being the temperature of its critical point 32°C. In the supercritical phase it is selective towards apolar compounds or weakly polar, so it is necessary to add co-solvents (ethanol and water are the co-solvents used in food processing) in order to extract the polar compounds. Applying this technology the thermal and chemical degradation of the products, which are completely free from processing residues, is prevented, while the solvent power and selectivity can be easily adjusted from gas-like to liquid-like by changing the pressure and temperature of the extraction, making thus possible the fractionation of the extract. SFE is a Green Technology and this guarantees competitive advantage in conjunction with sustainable development. The extraction of phenolic compounds from grape marc using supercritical CO2 containing 15% ethanol–water mixture (57%, v/v) (EtW) as co-solvent, at 8, 10, 20 and 30 MPa/313.15 K suggested 8 MPa as the most suitable pressure. The evaluation of the ‘bioavailability’ of the grape-CO2 extracts so obtained was carried out . The ‘bioavailability’ is a key step in ensuring ‘bioefficacy’ of bioactive compounds when used as supplements because they need to be bioavailable in order to exert any beneficial effects on human health.

Publication date: April 4, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Carla Da Porto*, Andrea Natolino, Dario Vojnovic, Deborha Decorti

*University of Udine

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Dissecting the polysaccharide‐rich grape cell wall matrix during the red winemaking process, using high‐throughput and fractionation methods

Limited information is available on grape wall-derived polymeric structure/composition and how this changes during fermentation. Commercial winemaking operations use enzymes that target the polysaccharide-rich polymers of the cell walls of grape tissues to clarify musts and extract pigments during the fermentations. In this study we have assessed changes in polysaccharide composition/ turnover throughout the winemaking process by applying recently developed cell wall profiling approaches to both wine and pomace polysaccharides. The methods included gas chromatography for monosaccharide composition (GC-MS), infra-red (IR) spectroscopy and comprehensive microarray polymer profiling
(CoMPP) using cell wall probes.

Screening sensory-directed methodology for the selection of non-saccharomyces wine yeasts based on perceived aroma quality

The present work contributes by developing a rapid sensory-directed methodology for the screening and selection of high quality wines with different sensory profiles Therefore, Verdejo and Tempranillo musts were fermented with 50 different yeasts each under controlled laboratory conditions. Resulting samples were firstly categorized according to five levels of quality by a panel of wine professionals (Sáenz-Navajas, Ballester et al. 2013). Higher quality samples were described by flash profiling by a semi-trained panel
(Valentin, Chollet et al. 2012) and most distinctive samples were screened by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) (López, Aznar et al. 2002).

Assessing the effect of oak derived aromas on mouthfeel perception in Chardonnay wine

Mouthfeel is an important quality parameter for Chardonnay wines, particularly those aged in oak. While research on mouthfeel has traditionally focused on the impact of non-aromatic compounds, the role of aroma compounds has largely been over looked. However, in wine as well as other food interactions between retronasal aroma and mouthfeel have been noted. The goal of this research was to investigate the impact of wine aroma on the perception of mouthfeel. Because of the importance of oak aging in the development of Chardonnay mouthfeel, the impact of oak aromas on perceived mouthfeel was explored. Aroma compounds associated with oak (ethyl palmitate, eugenol, furfural, isoeugenol, syringaldehyde, vanillin and whiskey lactone) were added to two different Chardonnay wines; one with no oak influence and one fermented in neutral oak. Low and high concentrations of the compounds were added based on concentrations typically found in barrel aged Chardonnay wine.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Effect of concentration and competition between different fungicide residues on the adsorption efficiency of activated vegetal fibres for treatment of wine

Vineyards are strongly exposed to fungal diseases, attacks from insects and competition with weeds. Most treatments used on grape vines contain synthetic active substances, which may be transferred to the wine. Such pesticides have a negative image because many active substances are potential health hazards. A specific oenological treatment allowing the reduction of pesticide residues in wine based on activated vegetable fibres (AVF) is under examination by the International Organisation for Vine and Wine. This technique works efficiently and alters the wine only little (Lempereur et al. 2014).