Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Extraction of polyphenols from grape marc by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and evaluation of their ‘bioavailability’ as dietary supplements

Extraction of polyphenols from grape marc by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and evaluation of their ‘bioavailability’ as dietary supplements

Abstract

In the winemaking process, several compounds that remain in the grape skins and seeds after the fermentation stage are bioactive-compounds (substances with potential beneficial effects on health) that can be extracted in order to recovery valuable substances with a high commercial value for the cosmetic, food (nutraceuticals) and pharmaceutical industries. The skins contain significant amounts of bioactive substances such as tannins (16-27%) and other polyphenolic compounds (2-6.5%) in particular, catechins, anthocyanins, proanthocyanins, quercetin , ellagic acid and resveratrol. The seeds, in addition to oil, contain approximately 60% of the polyphenols present in grape, in particular an high concentration of flavan-3-ols, catechin and epicatechin. Grape seed extracts are very potent antioxidants and exhibit numerous interesting pharmacologic activities The traditional extraction methods used for polyphenols from solid or semi-solid materials have been focused on methods, which use organic solvents. These methods are laborious and time consuming, promote degradation reactions, have low selectivity and/or low extraction yields. Moreover, these conventional techniques employ large amounts of toxic solvents. Some of these critical points could be over boost with Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE). The most used solvent in extraction with supercritical fluids is the CO2, which is economical, safe, non-toxic (it does not leave residues in extract) and reaches supercritical conditions easily (32°C and 74 bar). It is suitable for thermo-labile substances being the temperature of its critical point 32°C. In the supercritical phase it is selective towards apolar compounds or weakly polar, so it is necessary to add co-solvents (ethanol and water are the co-solvents used in food processing) in order to extract the polar compounds. Applying this technology the thermal and chemical degradation of the products, which are completely free from processing residues, is prevented, while the solvent power and selectivity can be easily adjusted from gas-like to liquid-like by changing the pressure and temperature of the extraction, making thus possible the fractionation of the extract. SFE is a Green Technology and this guarantees competitive advantage in conjunction with sustainable development. The extraction of phenolic compounds from grape marc using supercritical CO2 containing 15% ethanol–water mixture (57%, v/v) (EtW) as co-solvent, at 8, 10, 20 and 30 MPa/313.15 K suggested 8 MPa as the most suitable pressure. The evaluation of the ‘bioavailability’ of the grape-CO2 extracts so obtained was carried out . The ‘bioavailability’ is a key step in ensuring ‘bioefficacy’ of bioactive compounds when used as supplements because they need to be bioavailable in order to exert any beneficial effects on human health.

Publication date: April 4, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Carla Da Porto*, Andrea Natolino, Dario Vojnovic, Deborha Decorti

*University of Udine

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

How small amounts of oxygen introduced during bottling and storage can influence the metabolic fingerprint and SO2 content of white wines

The impact of minute amounts of headspace oxygen on the post-bottling development of wine is generally considered to be very important, since oxygen, packaging and storage conditions can either damage or improve wine quality. This is reflected in the generalised use of inert bottling lines, where the headspace between the white wine and the stopper is filled with an inert gas. This experiment aimed to address some open questions about the chemistry of the interaction between wine and oxygen, crucial for decisions regarding optimal closure. While it is known that similar amounts of oxygen affect different wines to a variable extent, our knowledge of chemistry is not sufficient to construct a predictive method.

Impact of non-fruity compounds on red wines fruity aromatic expression: the role of higher alcohols

A part, at least, of the fruity aroma of red wines is the consequence of perceptive interactions between various aromatic compounds, particularly ethyl esters and acetates, which may contribute to the perception of fruity aromas, specifically thanks to synergistic effects.1,2 The question of the indirect impact of non-fruity compounds on this particular aromatic expression has not yet been widely investigated. Among these compounds higher alcohols (HA) represent the main group, from a quantitative standpoint, of volatiles in many alcoholic beverages. Moreover, some bibliographic data suggested their contribution to the aromatic complexity by either increasing or masking flavors of wine, depending of their concentrations.

Elicitors used as a tool to increase stilbenes in grapes and wines

The economic importance of grapevine as a crop plant makes Vitis vinífera a good model system to study the improvement of the nutraceutical properties of food products (Vezulli et al. 2007). Stilbenes in general, and trans-resveratrol in particular, have been reported to be responsible for various beneficial effects. Resveratrol´s biological properties include antibacteria and antifungal effects, as well as cardioprotective, neuroprotective and anticâncer actions (Guerrero et al. 2010 ). Stilbenes can be induced by biotic and abiotic elicitors since they are phytoalexins (Bavaresco et al. 2001).

Impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels on the odor threshold of 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtalene (petrol off-flavor) and role of berry size and Riesling clones

1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtelene (TDN) evokes the odor of “petrol” in wine, especially in the variety Riesling. Increasing UV-radiation due to climate change intensifies formation of carotenoids in the berry skins and an increase of TDN-precursors1. Exploring new viticultural and oenological strategies to limit TDN formation in the future requires precise knowledge of TDN thresholds in different matrices. Thresholds reported in the literature vary substantially between 2 µg/L up to 20 µg/L2,3,4 due to the use of different methods. As Riesling grapes are used for very different wine styles such as dry, sweet or sparkling wines, it is essential to study the impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels.

Use of glutathione under different grape processing and winemaking conditions and its impact on the formation of sulfide off-flavors, colour, and sensory characteristics of Riesling, Sauvignon blanc, and Chardonnay

The use of glutathione (GSH) in winemaking has been legitimated recently, according to OIV resolutions OENO 445-2015 and OENO 446-2015 a maximum dose of 20 mg/L is now allowed to use in must and wine. Several studies have proven the benefits of GSH, predominantly in Sauvignon blanc. Thus, oxidative coloration of must and wine is limited, aroma compounds such as volatile thiols are preserved, and the development of ageing flavors such as sotolon and 2-aminoacetophenone is impeded. The protective effect may be explained by the high affinity of GSH to bind o-quinones which are formed during phenolic oxidation and which are known to initiate browning and other oxidative changes. Some researchers have proposed the hydroxycinnamic acid to GSH ratio (HGR) as an indicator of oxidation susceptibility of must and could show that lower ratios yielded lighter musts.