Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Abstract

The occurrence of faults and taints in wine, such as those caused by microbial spoilage or various taints, have resulted in significant financial losses to wine producers. The wine industry commits significant financial resources towards fining and taint removal processes each year. Fining involves the addition of one or more adsorptive substrates to juice or wine to bind certain components, thus reducing their concentration [1]. However, these processes are often not selective and can also remove desirable flavour and aroma compounds. Computational modelling techniques have not previously been exploited by the wine sector but have been used in other fields to predict the behaviour of target compounds with selected substrates. This study aimed to better elucidate the binding interactions between wine components (both desirable and undesirable) and common adsorbents through computational modelling and laboratory scale fining trials in order to improve the selection of adsorbents for specific fining or taint removal applications. The binding energies for a range of volatile compounds associated with common wine faults and taints, including guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, cresols and syringol (smoke taint), 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylphenol (Brettanomyces spoilage), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP; ladybird taint), geosmin and methylisoborneol (fungal taint) and trichloroanisole (cork taint), as well as volatiles associated with varietal aroma and flavour, including esters, C13-norisoprenoids and monoterpenes, or oak maturation, including cis- and trans-oak lactone, vanillin and eugenol, were calculated against a range of adsorbent substrates, including bentonite, polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) and α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) using the density functional theory as implemented in FHI-aims, a software package for atomic scale materials modelling. The computational data suggests that α-CD could be used to selectively remove a variety of different molecules but it is less suitable for removal of IBMP. In fact, the strongest interaction comes from materials with strong hydrogen bonding systems, such as eugenol and vanillin. PVPP is a purely hydrogen-bonding sponge. It actively excludes substrates which do not hydrogen bond very well; thus, it has a very high selectivity for vanillin, and other molecules with pendant hydroxyl functionalities in a non-sterically limited environment (such as certain phenols). This presentation will comprise results from computational modelling experiments and fining experiments conducted in the laboratory. Quantitative chemical analysis of wine volatiles before and after fining treatment enables predictions based on computational approaches to be evaluated.

1. Castellari, M., Versari, A., Fabiani, A., Parpinello, G.P. and Galassi, S. (2001) Removal of ochratoxin A in red wines by means of absorption treatments with commercial fining agents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 3917–3921.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Julie Culbert*, Christopher Hendon, Kerry Wilkinson

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.

Characterizing the effects of nitrogen on grapevines with different scion/rootstock combinations: agronomic, metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches

Most vineyards are grafted and include a variety (Vitis vinifera) grafted over a wild Vitis rootstock (hybrids of V. berlandieri, riparia and rupestris). Grape berry quality at harvest depends on a subtle balance between acidity and the concentrations of sugars, polyphenols and precursors of aroma compounds. The mechanisms controlling the balance of sugars/acids/polyphenols are influenced by the abiotic environment, in particular nitrogen supply, and interact with the genotypes of both the scion variety and the rootstock. Previous work suggests that some of the effects of water stress are in fact linked to a nitrogen deficiency driven indirectly by the reduction of water absorption.

Microbial life in the grapevine: what can we expect from the leaf microbiome?

The above-ground parts of plants, which constitute the phyllosphere, have long been considered devoid of bacteria and fungi, at least in their internal tissues and microbial presence there was long considered a sign of disease. However, recent studies have shown that plants harbour complex bacterial communities, the so-called “microbiome”[1]. We are only beginning to unravel the origin of these bacterial plant inhabitants, their community structure and their roles, which in analogy to the gut microbiome, are likely to be of essential nature. Among their multifaceted metabolic possibilities, bacteria have been recently demonstrated to emit a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can greatly impact the growth and development of both the plant and its disease-causing agents.

Simultaneous monitoring of dissolved CO2 and collar from Rosé sparkling wine glasses: the impact of yeast macromolecules

Champagne or sparkling wines elaborated through the same traditional method, which consists in two major yeast-fermented steps, typically hold about 10 to 12 g/L of dissolved CO2 after the second fermentation in a closed bottle. Hundreds of molecules and macromolecules originating from grape and yeast cohabit with dissolved CO2; they are essential compounds contributing to many organoleptic characteristics (effervescence, foam, aroma, taste, colour…). Indeed, the second alcoholic fermentation and the maturation on lees (which may last from 12 months up to several years) both induce various quantitative and qualitative changes in the wine through the action of yeast, as listed hereafter: development of aromas during aging on lees, release of nitrogen compounds during autolysis and release of macromolecules (polysaccharides, lipids, nucleic acids) in wine.

Impact of elemental sulfur (S0) residues in Sauvignon blanc juice on the formation of the varietal thiols 3-mercapto hexanol and 3-mercaptohexyl acetate

Elemental sulfur is a fungicide used by grape growers to control the development of powdery mildew, caused by the fungus Erysiphe necator. This compound is effective, cheap and has a low toxicity with no withholding period recommended. However, high levels of S0 residues in the harvested grapes can lead to the formation of reductive sulfur compounds that can impart taints and faults to the wine. Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is a very volatile and unpleasant sulfur compound which formation is connected to high residues of S0 in juice (10 – 100 mg/L).