Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Abstract

The occurrence of faults and taints in wine, such as those caused by microbial spoilage or various taints, have resulted in significant financial losses to wine producers. The wine industry commits significant financial resources towards fining and taint removal processes each year. Fining involves the addition of one or more adsorptive substrates to juice or wine to bind certain components, thus reducing their concentration [1]. However, these processes are often not selective and can also remove desirable flavour and aroma compounds. Computational modelling techniques have not previously been exploited by the wine sector but have been used in other fields to predict the behaviour of target compounds with selected substrates. This study aimed to better elucidate the binding interactions between wine components (both desirable and undesirable) and common adsorbents through computational modelling and laboratory scale fining trials in order to improve the selection of adsorbents for specific fining or taint removal applications. The binding energies for a range of volatile compounds associated with common wine faults and taints, including guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, cresols and syringol (smoke taint), 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylphenol (Brettanomyces spoilage), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP; ladybird taint), geosmin and methylisoborneol (fungal taint) and trichloroanisole (cork taint), as well as volatiles associated with varietal aroma and flavour, including esters, C13-norisoprenoids and monoterpenes, or oak maturation, including cis- and trans-oak lactone, vanillin and eugenol, were calculated against a range of adsorbent substrates, including bentonite, polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) and α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) using the density functional theory as implemented in FHI-aims, a software package for atomic scale materials modelling. The computational data suggests that α-CD could be used to selectively remove a variety of different molecules but it is less suitable for removal of IBMP. In fact, the strongest interaction comes from materials with strong hydrogen bonding systems, such as eugenol and vanillin. PVPP is a purely hydrogen-bonding sponge. It actively excludes substrates which do not hydrogen bond very well; thus, it has a very high selectivity for vanillin, and other molecules with pendant hydroxyl functionalities in a non-sterically limited environment (such as certain phenols). This presentation will comprise results from computational modelling experiments and fining experiments conducted in the laboratory. Quantitative chemical analysis of wine volatiles before and after fining treatment enables predictions based on computational approaches to be evaluated.

1. Castellari, M., Versari, A., Fabiani, A., Parpinello, G.P. and Galassi, S. (2001) Removal of ochratoxin A in red wines by means of absorption treatments with commercial fining agents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 3917–3921.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Julie Culbert*, Christopher Hendon, Kerry Wilkinson

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Merging fast sensory profiling with non-targeted GC-MS analysis for multifactorial experimental wine making

Wine aroma is influenced by several viticultural and oenological factors. In this study we used experimental wine making in a full factorial design to determine the impact of grapevine age, must turbidity, and yeast strain on the aroma of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling wines. A recently developed, non-targeted SPME-GC-MS fingerprinting approach for wine volatiles was used. This approach includes the segmentation and mathematical transformation of chromatograms in combination with Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) and subsequent deconvolution of important chromatogram segments.

The impact of different yeasts and harvest time on the wine quality of Beihong and Beimei (<I>V. vinifera x V. amurensis</I>)

Beihong and Beimei are two wine cultivars from ‘Muscat Hamberg’ (V. vinifera L.) and wild V. amurensis Rupr., which were released in China in 2008. Here,two enology practices were reported. Firstly, the impact of different yeasts including D254, GRE, K1, D21 and BDX on dry wine quality of Beihong and Beimei was investigated. For Beihong, among wines fermented by all yeasts, residual sugar content was the lowest, total anthocyanin and resveratrol contents were the highest in the wine by D254. However, the wine by D254 had lower titrable acid than those by the other yeasts except BDX.

Impact of some agronomic practices on grape skins anthocyanin content

Wine colour is the first quality characteristic to be assessed, especially regarding red wines. Anthocyanins are very well known to be the main responsible compounds for red wine colour. Red cultivars can synthesize and accumulate anthocyanins in berry skin to express their colour. However, anthocyanin accumulation is often influenced by a series of factors, such as genetic regulation, phytohormones, environmental conditions and viticultural management.

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).