Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

Abstract

The occurrence of faults and taints in wine, such as those caused by microbial spoilage or various taints, have resulted in significant financial losses to wine producers. The wine industry commits significant financial resources towards fining and taint removal processes each year. Fining involves the addition of one or more adsorptive substrates to juice or wine to bind certain components, thus reducing their concentration [1]. However, these processes are often not selective and can also remove desirable flavour and aroma compounds. Computational modelling techniques have not previously been exploited by the wine sector but have been used in other fields to predict the behaviour of target compounds with selected substrates. This study aimed to better elucidate the binding interactions between wine components (both desirable and undesirable) and common adsorbents through computational modelling and laboratory scale fining trials in order to improve the selection of adsorbents for specific fining or taint removal applications. The binding energies for a range of volatile compounds associated with common wine faults and taints, including guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, cresols and syringol (smoke taint), 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylphenol (Brettanomyces spoilage), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP; ladybird taint), geosmin and methylisoborneol (fungal taint) and trichloroanisole (cork taint), as well as volatiles associated with varietal aroma and flavour, including esters, C13-norisoprenoids and monoterpenes, or oak maturation, including cis- and trans-oak lactone, vanillin and eugenol, were calculated against a range of adsorbent substrates, including bentonite, polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) and α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) using the density functional theory as implemented in FHI-aims, a software package for atomic scale materials modelling. The computational data suggests that α-CD could be used to selectively remove a variety of different molecules but it is less suitable for removal of IBMP. In fact, the strongest interaction comes from materials with strong hydrogen bonding systems, such as eugenol and vanillin. PVPP is a purely hydrogen-bonding sponge. It actively excludes substrates which do not hydrogen bond very well; thus, it has a very high selectivity for vanillin, and other molecules with pendant hydroxyl functionalities in a non-sterically limited environment (such as certain phenols). This presentation will comprise results from computational modelling experiments and fining experiments conducted in the laboratory. Quantitative chemical analysis of wine volatiles before and after fining treatment enables predictions based on computational approaches to be evaluated.

1. Castellari, M., Versari, A., Fabiani, A., Parpinello, G.P. and Galassi, S. (2001) Removal of ochratoxin A in red wines by means of absorption treatments with commercial fining agents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 3917–3921.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Julie Culbert*, Christopher Hendon, Kerry Wilkinson

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Modulating role of SO2 in white wine protein haze formation

Despite the extensive research performed during the last decades, the multifactorial mechanism responsible for the white wine protein haze formation is not fully characterized. Herein, a new model is proposed, which is based on the experimental identification of sulfur dioxide as a major modulating factor inducing wine protein haze upon heating. As opposed to other reducing agents, such as 2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), the addition of SO2 to must/wine upon heating cleaves intraprotein disulfide bonds, hinders thiol-disulfide exchange during protein interactions and can lead to the formation of novel inter/intraprotein disulfide bonds. Those are eventually responsible for wine protein aggregation which follows a nucleation-growth kinetic model as shown by dynamic light scattering [1].

South Africa’s top 10 Sauvignon blanc wines. How do the chemical and sensory profiles compare?

FNB Top 10 Sauvignon Blanc competition, presented by the Sauvignon Blanc Interest Group of South Africa and sponsored by First National Bank, is the country’s foremost platform for producers of this cultivar to showcase and benchmark their wines. Wines entered in the competition originated from all over the winegrowing regions of the country and the winning wines showed good representation of quality South African Sauvignon blanc wines. The ten selected wines were subjected to various chemical analyses including volatile thiol and methoxypyrazine determination, while the sensory profile of each wine was determined using projective mapping.

Characterization of Glycosidically Bound Aroma Compounds of País cv. grapes of different Chilean zones

País grape has been estimated to arrive to Chile almost 500 years ago, being the first strain grown in this country. Traditionally, this grape has been used to mix with other varieties, to produce poor quality wines, but today is beginning to be used in the production of high quality wines. However, very little is known about the chemical characteristics of this variety. The aroma is one of the most important quality attributes of wine. Volatile compounds of this beverage may come from the grape (varietal aromas), from the fermentation process, from the ageing. The aromatic compounds are found in the grape in two forms: as free volatile compounds and as non-volatile compounds. The last ones, are aroma precursors present mainly as glycoconjugates formed by a sugar and an aglycone…

Effect of intra‐vineyard ripeness variation on the efficiency of commercial enzymes on berry cell wall deconstruction under winemaking conditions

Intra-vineyard variation grape berry ripening occurs within bunches, between bunches on the same vine and between vines. Although it is assumed that such variation also occurs at the grape berry cell wall level, no study to data has investigated in any depth. Here we have used a intra-vineyard panel design to investigate pooled bunches from six vines (per panel) in the context of a winemaking scenario. The dissected vineyard was harvested by separate panels, where each panel was then subjected to a standard winemaking procedure with or without the addition of three different enzyme preparations for maceration.

Dissecting the polysaccharide‐rich grape cell wall matrix during the red winemaking process, using high‐throughput and fractionation methods

Limited information is available on grape wall-derived polymeric structure/composition and how this changes during fermentation. Commercial winemaking operations use enzymes that target the polysaccharide-rich polymers of the cell walls of grape tissues to clarify musts and extract pigments during the fermentations. In this study we have assessed changes in polysaccharide composition/ turnover throughout the winemaking process by applying recently developed cell wall profiling approaches to both wine and pomace polysaccharides. The methods included gas chromatography for monosaccharide composition (GC-MS), infra-red (IR) spectroscopy and comprehensive microarray polymer profiling
(CoMPP) using cell wall probes.