Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Characterization of commercial enological tannins and its effect on human saliva diffusion

Characterization of commercial enological tannins and its effect on human saliva diffusion

Abstract

Commercial oenological tannins (TECs) are widely used in the wine industry. TECs are rich in condensed tannins, hydrolyzable tannins or a mixture of both. Wine grapes are a important source of proanthocyanidins or condensed tannins while oak wood possess a high concentration of hydrolyzable tannins (Obreque-Slier et al., 2009). TECs contribute with the antioxidant capacity of wine, catalyze oxide-reduction reactions and participate in the removal of sulfur compounds and metals. One of the most important properties of TECs correspond to its contribution to the astringency (Zamora, 2003). Astringency, a sensation that is described as a puckering, rough, or drying mouth-feel, has been associated with interactions between some phenolic compounds (tannins) and salivary proteins (Bacon and Rhodes, 2000). A wide spectrum of enological tannins is now available on the market, classified mainly according to the enological properties. However, the tannins’ chemical nature is not always clearly defined. Furthermore, the effect of these on saliva is unknown. For that reason, the aim of this work was the chemical characterization of eleven commercial tannins sold for enological use. Likewise, we examined the effect of TECs on a physicochemical property of the salivary protein, namely, the mode of diffusion on cellulose membranes (Obreque-Slier et al., 2010). In this study, eleven enological tannins were characterized by classification into three groups according HPLC-DAD chromatography and spectroscopic analysis: enological products composed of proanthocyanidins, hydrolyzable, and the mixture of both types of tannins. Within each group, tannin composition varied greatly, mainly defined by the botanical origin of each commercial product. Similarly, when saliva was mixed with aliquots of increasing concentrations of TECs, we observed a progressive decrease in the blue-stained background of the distribution area of the salivary protein. The intensity of this restriction was in close relationship with the type of TECs. Finally, it was observed that certain TECs do not showed a effect on saliva diffusion on cellulose membranes.

References 1.- Bacon J., Rhodes M. 2000. Binding affinity of hydrolyzable tannins to parotid saliva and to proline-rich proteins derived from it. J Agric Food Chem 48, 838-843. 2.- Obreque-Slier E., Peña-Neira A., López-Solís R., Ramírez-Escudero C., Zamora-Marín F. 2009. Phenolic characterization of commercial enological tannins. Eur Food Res Technol 229, 859-866. 3.- Obreque-Slier E., Peña-Neira A., López-Solís, R. 2010. Quantitative determination of interactions between a tannin and a model protein using diffusion and precipitation assays on cellulose membranes. J Agric Food Chem 58, 8375-8379. 4.- Zamora, F. 2003. Elaboración y crianza del vino tinto: Aspectos científicos y prácticos. Madrid, España. Ediciones Mundi Prensa. 225p. Acknowledgments This study was supported by grant Fondecyt-Chile 1150240.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Elías Obreque Slier*, Álvaro Peña-Neira, Dante Munoz, Gina Vazallo, Marcela Medel, Remigio López

*Universidad de Chile

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Enological evaluation of the attitude of the grapevine fumin to give varietal wines

Initiatives have been ongoing in recent years to safeguard biodiversity in the oenological sector via a process of enhancement of ancient varieties, under a pressure of a market strongly oriented towards production deriving from native vines of specific geographical zones. In that sense, Aosta Valley
(Italy) has raised the need to preserve and characterize its minority vine varieties which have the potentiality to give varietal wines. Fumin represents the 7% of the production of the region with 16 hectares of vineyards and 753 hectolitres of derived wine. Due to its large phenolic potential, strong astringency and deep colour, it has long been, and is still today, assembled or blended with other varieties as occurs, for example, for the Torrette.

Characterization of free and glycosidically bound simple phenols in hybrid grape varieties using liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass (q-orbitrap)

Vitis vinifera is one of the most diffused grapevines over the word and it is the raw material for high quality wines production. The availability of more resistant interspecific hybrid vine varieties, developed from crosses between Vitis vinifera and other Vitis species, has generating much interest, also due to the low environmental effect of production. However, hybrid grape wine composition and varietal differences between interspecific hybrids are not well defined. Different studies revealed that wine consumption has health effects due to its high content of antioxidants, as phenolic compounds. In particular, simple phenols are appreciated not only for their physiological health benefits, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects, but also because they affect wines organoleptic profile and have a significant role in defining their nutritional characteristics.

Effect of intra‐vineyard ripeness variation on the efficiency of commercial enzymes on berry cell wall deconstruction under winemaking conditions

Intra-vineyard variation grape berry ripening occurs within bunches, between bunches on the same vine and between vines. Although it is assumed that such variation also occurs at the grape berry cell wall level, no study to data has investigated in any depth. Here we have used a intra-vineyard panel design to investigate pooled bunches from six vines (per panel) in the context of a winemaking scenario. The dissected vineyard was harvested by separate panels, where each panel was then subjected to a standard winemaking procedure with or without the addition of three different enzyme preparations for maceration.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.