Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Thinner topsoil improves vine growth and fruit composition in Mid-Atlantic United States vineyards

Thinner topsoil improves vine growth and fruit composition in Mid-Atlantic United States vineyards

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of topsoil thickness on dormant pruning weights, cluster compactness, and fruit composition (°Brix, titratable acidity, pH) in the Mid-Atlantic of the United States. 

Methods and Results: An Albariño vineyard in Frederick County, Maryland was previously terraced, resulting in topsoil (A-horizon) thickness differences while other factors are constant (weather, vine spacing, training, cultivar/clone/rootstock). We surveyed topsoil thickness along two transects using a combination of hand dug pits and soil probes, determining “topsoil” based on soil color and structure. The topsoil thickness we surveyed ranged from 0 to 30 cm. For reference, the vineyard’s mapped soil series, Mt. Zion, has 13 to 15 cm of topsoil.

Each panel of six vines served as an experimental unit, and we sampled 29 panels total corresponding to the topsoil measurement locations in 2019. We collected dormant pruning weights as well as cluster compactness (berries per cm rachis) and fruit chemistry (pH, titratable acidity, and °Brix). Fruit from vines growing in thinner topsoil had significantly lower titratable acidity and higher °Brix (R= 0.24). The correlation between topsoil and fruit titratable acidity was particularly strong, with topsoil thickness explaining 66.1% of variation in titratable acidity. There was not a significant relationship between topsoil thickness and fruit pH, but vines in thinner topsoil exhibited looser clusters (R2 = 0.27) and lower pruning weights (R= 0.58). 

Conclusions: 

Preliminary results suggest that fruit from vines growing in thinner topsoil ripen earlier. Compared to vines growing in thicker topsoil, they had lower titratable acidity and higher °Brix. Thinner topsoil also resulted in lower dormant pruning weights which indicates smaller vines, and looser clusters which may help with disease pressure. Understanding topsoil’s contribution to vine growth and fruit composition will help inform decisions about vineyard site selection, soil management, harvest time, and the overall terroir of a site. 

Significance and Impact of the Study: The viticulture industry in the Mid-Atlantic United States is growing, but their ability to support high-quality wine grape production may be hindered by certain soil properties. Many Mid-Atlantic soils are highly fertile and have relatively high available water holding capacity. In combination with the Mid-Atlantic’s humid continental climate, these soil properties can provide excessive plant-available water and nutrients to grapevines. Such excesses often produce vigorous vegetative growth (i.e., vigor) and detrimentally impact fruit composition and potential wine quality. Topsoil management could be an approach for growers to influence hydrology and fertility of vineyard soil. Choosing sites with less topsoil and/or managing topsoil thickness may help growers optimize their fruit chemistry and potentially predict and/or influence fruit ripening. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jaclyn C. Fiola*, Ryan D. Stewart, Tony K. Wolf, and Greg K. Evanylo

School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, 185 Ag Quad Lane, Blacksburg, VA 24061

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil fertility, soil hydrology, soil management, Mid-Atlantic 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Wine fining with yeast protein extract: effect on polyphenol composition and the related sensorial attributes

Polyphenols, namely anthocyanins and flavanols, are key compounds for wine color definition and taste perception (astringency and bitterness). During winemaking, several processes could influence the polyphenol composition and, therefore, the organoleptic parameters of wine.

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.

The effect of ultrasounds in syrah wine quality is not dependent on the ripening or sanitary status of the grapes

Different studies have demonstrated that the application of ultrasounds (US) to crushed grapes improves chromatic characteristics of the wines (1,2), increases their polysaccharide content (3) and some aroma compounds are also favored (4,5)

Les effets du terroir ou l’expression des potentiels à valoriser

Research into the effects of the Terroir is of major interest for the wine sector. The study of Terroir-Vine-Grape relations, even if it is complex, is fundamental for all viticulture: indeed, the quality of the grape must be the result of the most reasoned agro-viticultural management of the vine possible, which must first, to respect a production balance. The goal sought by the winegrower is to obtain a wine, the optimized result of the interactions Terroir-Grape variety. This link to the terroir is therefore essential to establish by taking into account on the one hand the behavior of the vine (which is the cause), and on the other hand, its effects on the grapes and finally on the wine.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.