Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Thinner topsoil improves vine growth and fruit composition in Mid-Atlantic United States vineyards

Thinner topsoil improves vine growth and fruit composition in Mid-Atlantic United States vineyards

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of topsoil thickness on dormant pruning weights, cluster compactness, and fruit composition (°Brix, titratable acidity, pH) in the Mid-Atlantic of the United States. 

Methods and Results: An Albariño vineyard in Frederick County, Maryland was previously terraced, resulting in topsoil (A-horizon) thickness differences while other factors are constant (weather, vine spacing, training, cultivar/clone/rootstock). We surveyed topsoil thickness along two transects using a combination of hand dug pits and soil probes, determining “topsoil” based on soil color and structure. The topsoil thickness we surveyed ranged from 0 to 30 cm. For reference, the vineyard’s mapped soil series, Mt. Zion, has 13 to 15 cm of topsoil.

Each panel of six vines served as an experimental unit, and we sampled 29 panels total corresponding to the topsoil measurement locations in 2019. We collected dormant pruning weights as well as cluster compactness (berries per cm rachis) and fruit chemistry (pH, titratable acidity, and °Brix). Fruit from vines growing in thinner topsoil had significantly lower titratable acidity and higher °Brix (R= 0.24). The correlation between topsoil and fruit titratable acidity was particularly strong, with topsoil thickness explaining 66.1% of variation in titratable acidity. There was not a significant relationship between topsoil thickness and fruit pH, but vines in thinner topsoil exhibited looser clusters (R2 = 0.27) and lower pruning weights (R= 0.58). 

Conclusions: 

Preliminary results suggest that fruit from vines growing in thinner topsoil ripen earlier. Compared to vines growing in thicker topsoil, they had lower titratable acidity and higher °Brix. Thinner topsoil also resulted in lower dormant pruning weights which indicates smaller vines, and looser clusters which may help with disease pressure. Understanding topsoil’s contribution to vine growth and fruit composition will help inform decisions about vineyard site selection, soil management, harvest time, and the overall terroir of a site. 

Significance and Impact of the Study: The viticulture industry in the Mid-Atlantic United States is growing, but their ability to support high-quality wine grape production may be hindered by certain soil properties. Many Mid-Atlantic soils are highly fertile and have relatively high available water holding capacity. In combination with the Mid-Atlantic’s humid continental climate, these soil properties can provide excessive plant-available water and nutrients to grapevines. Such excesses often produce vigorous vegetative growth (i.e., vigor) and detrimentally impact fruit composition and potential wine quality. Topsoil management could be an approach for growers to influence hydrology and fertility of vineyard soil. Choosing sites with less topsoil and/or managing topsoil thickness may help growers optimize their fruit chemistry and potentially predict and/or influence fruit ripening. 

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Jaclyn C. Fiola*, Ryan D. Stewart, Tony K. Wolf, and Greg K. Evanylo

School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, 185 Ag Quad Lane, Blacksburg, VA 24061

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil fertility, soil hydrology, soil management, Mid-Atlantic 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

The modification of cultural practices in grapevine cv. Syrah, does it modify the characteristics of the musts?

The work shows the results of a year of experimentation (2020) in a Syrah variety vineyard in La Roda (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). The trial approach was on a randomized block design with two factors: Irrigation (I) and Pruning (P).
Irrigation schedules were adjusted to apply amounts close to 1,500 m3/ha. With this provision, 2 different irrigation treatments were proposed: I1) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to post-harvest (providing at least 20 % of the total amount of irrigation water to be provided post-harvest); I2) Start of irrigation from pea-sized grape to harvest (usual irrigation practice in the study area). Pruning was proposed with two treatments, one at the end of January (P1), which is pruning on a conventional date; and P2) pruning carried out at the beginning of budding. In total, 4 repetitions were designed with 4 elementary plots, each one of them representing one of the proposed treatments (I1P1; I1P2; I2P1; I2P2). In total, 16 plots were worked on and each elementary plot consisted of 30 strains, distributed in 3 lines.
The productive response was evaluated with the yield results of the harvest harvested at 23 ºBrix. The qualitative response was measured in the musts through the indices of technological (acidity, pH and potassium) and phenolic maturity and aromatic compounds in free and glycosylated fractions. The treatments tested had, in general, an effect on the different variables analyzed.

Effect of fertigation strategies to adapt PGI Côtes de Gascogne production to hot vintage

The development of fertigation could be a possible solution to adapt PGI Côtes de Gascogne (south-western France) wine production to climate change. The goal would be to limit the negative effects of water stress on yield performance expectation (around 15 tons per hectare) and to make the use of fertilizers more efficient. This study aimed to compare the effects of three strategies of water and minerals supply on grapes and wines qualities. Two fertigation practices were compared to a rainfed control which is the current standard of the local grape growing production. The fertilizers (nitrogen and potassium) were (i) fully brought by irrigation pipe during the season, (ii) partially brought by irrigation pipe and partially on the soil or (iii) fully brought on the soil at the beginning of the season for the non-irrigated control (local standard). The trial was run on cv. Colombard trained on spur pruned with vertical shoot positioning system on a sandy-silty-clay soil over the 2020 vintage which was particularly hot for the region. Moderate to strong water deficit appeared during the growing period of the berries and held on after veraison. Irrigation strategies allowed for maintaining grapevine without water deficit and being significantly different from the control water status. Grapevine with fully or partial fertigation strategies produced 25% more yield mainly due to the increase of the bunch weight. Also, the fully fertigation showed the best ratio between yield and maturity and brought 30% less of fertilizers (both nitrogen and potassium) than the two other strategies. Finally, the analysis of aromatic compounds in Colombard wines, varietal thiols family, showed the same level of concentrations for the 3 treatments, confirming that the yield performance did not impact the aromatic potential in this trial.

A predictive model of spatial Eca variability in the vineyard to support the monitoring of plant status

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Effect of one-year cover crop and arbuscular mycorrhiza inocululation in the microbial soil community of a vineyard

The microbial composition of the soil is an important factor to consider in viticulture, since its influence on the “terroir” and on the organoleptic properties of the wine have been demonstrated. Different agronomic techniques have the potential to modify the composition and functionality of the soil microbial community. Maintaining green covers is known to increase soil microbial diversity. The direct application of inoculum of beneficial microorganisms to the soil has also been used to increase their abundance. However, the environmental conditions of each site seem to have a determining weight in the result of these practices. In this study, we compared the effect on the microbial community of a cover crop with legumes in autumn and the inoculation of grapevines with commercial inoculum bases on Rhizophagus irregularis and Funeliformis mosseae in the previous spring. The study has been carried out in a vineyard in Binissalem, Mallorca, Spain. After applying the treatments, we will analyze the soil microbial communities using the data obtained from Illumina amplification of soil DNA from the 16S and ITS regions to analyze bacteria and fungi community, respectively. In addition, we will record the physicochemical characteristics of the soil at each sampling point. The result showed that agronomic management, in the short term, has less influence than soil characteristics on the composition of the soil microbiome. With these results, we can conclude that in a vineyard, agricultural techniques should focus on improving the characteristics of the soil to improve the biodiversity of the soil microbiota.