Enoforum 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Enoforum Web 9 Enoforum Web Conference 2021 9 Cellar session 9 All acids are equal, but some acids are more equal than others: (bio)acidification of wines

All acids are equal, but some acids are more equal than others: (bio)acidification of wines

Abstract

Insufficient acidity in grapes from warm(ing) climates is commonly corrected through addition of tartaric acid during vinification, and less so with other organic acids. One alternative approach involves bio-acidification with certain strains of Lachancea thermotolerans (LT) via lactic acid production during fermentation. Our previous work delivered a superior LT starter capable of lowering wine pH by ~0.5 units when used in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC).  Here, we aimed to i) compare the profiles of the bio-acidified LT wines and the acid-adjusted SC wines, and ii) evaluate the use of LT wines as blending components. For this purpose, high sugar/pH Merlot grapes (14.5 ° Bé; pH 3.9) were fermented with a sequential culture of LT and SC, and an SC monoculture control. The two obtained wines blended in three proportions (1:3, 1:1, 3:1), and the aliquots of the SC control (pH 4) were also acidified with either tartaric or lactic acid to the pH of the LT wine (pH 3.5).  Chemical analysis revealed major differences in a range of compositional parameters, which were reflected in the sensory profiles of wines, as confirmed via ‘Rate-All-That-Apply’ evaluation by wine experts (n=30). Sensory profiles of the bio-acidified LT wine and the lactic acid-adjusted SC wine were similar, and contrasting to the tartaric acid-adjusted SC wine. Despite the identical initial matrix, adjustment with lactic acid resulted in intenser ‘red fruit’ flavour, and lower ‘hotness’, ‘bitterness’ and ‘body’ relative to the adjustment with tartaric acid, driven by increases in ‘sourness’. The profiles of blends were modulated depending on the proportion of the bio-acidified wine, thus highlighting the potential of this approach to fine-tune ‘freshness’ and differentiate wine styles.

DOI:

Publication date: April 23, 2021

Issue: Enoforum 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Ana Hranilovic 1, 2; Marina Bely 1; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede 1,3; Warren Albertin 1,4, Vladimir Jiranek 2, 5

1 ISVV, University of Bordeaux, Villenave d’Ornon, France
2 Department of Wine and Food Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
3 Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Gradignan, France
4 ENSCBP, Bordeaux INP, Pessac, France
5 The Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production, Adelaide, Australia

Contact the author

Tags

Enoforum 2021 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

OPTIMIZATION, VALIDATION AND APPLICATION OF THE EPR SPIN-TRAPPING TECHNIQUE TO THE DETECTION OF FREE RADICALS IN CHARDONNAY WINES

The aging potential of Burgundy chardonnay wines is considered as quality indicator. However, some of them exhibit higher oxidative sensitivity and premature oxidative aging symptoms, which are potentially induced by no-enzymatic oxidation such as Fenton-type reaction (Danilewicz, 2003). This chemical mechanism involves the action of transition metal, native phenolic compounds and oxygen which promote the generation of highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radicals (OH) or 1-hydroxyethyl radicals (1-HER) from oxidation of ethanol. Such mechanism is involved in the radical oxidation occurring during bottle aging. According to Elias et al.,(2009a), the 1-HER is the most abundant radical in forced oxidation treated wines. Consequently, understanding its evolution kinetic in dry white wines is of great importance.

Read More

Utilization of remote sensing technology to detect riesling vineyard variability

ineyard blocks can vary spatially with respect to several viticulturally significant qualities such as soil variables, vine vigor, vine physiology

Read More

Phloem anatomy traits predict maximum sugar accumulation rates

Heat and water stress can accelerate berry sugar accumulation and lead to excessive sugar-to-acid ratios at harvest, producing bland, overly-alcoholic wines. Selecting grapevines for slower sugar accumulation could help maintain wine quality under future, hotter conditions, but these efforts have been stymied by our limited understanding of the traits determining sugar accumulation rates. Here, we measured traits characterizing the structure and anatomy of the sugar transport system – the phloem – in 16 winegrape cultivars and tested for relationships with sugar accumulation rates and cultivar climate classifications.

Read More

Can grapevine tolerance to bunch rot be directly induced by groundcover management?

Botrytis bunch rot occurrence is the most important limitation for the wine industry in humid environments. The effect of grapevine vegetative growth on bunch rot expression results from direct effects (cluster architecture, nitrogen status among others) and indirect ones (via microclimate). Previous studies of our group showed strong differences in bunch rot incidence between floor management treatments: cover crop (CC) vs weed-free strips under the trellis with herbicide (H). We observed that in some circumstances this reduction in bunch rot incidence occurred without major vine growth differences among treatments. The aim of the present study was to test the general hypothesis that other factors unrelated to grapevine vegetative expression could be more relevant to grapevine susceptibility to bunch rot.

Read More

Survey of winegrape irrigation practices in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley of California

In California vineyards, irrigation is considered as one of the most important decisions growers will make. Recent research has revealed that decisions of when to begin irrigation and how much water to apply have considerable consequences for final grape quality and hence wine quality. However, it is unclear whether and to what extent the average winegrape grower uses objective data to begin irrigating or to determine the amount of water to apply.

Read More