Enoforum 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Enoforum Web 9 Enoforum Web Conference 2021 9 Cellar session 9 All acids are equal, but some acids are more equal than others: (bio)acidification of wines

All acids are equal, but some acids are more equal than others: (bio)acidification of wines

Abstract

Insufficient acidity in grapes from warm(ing) climates is commonly corrected through addition of tartaric acid during vinification, and less so with other organic acids. One alternative approach involves bio-acidification with certain strains of Lachancea thermotolerans (LT) via lactic acid production during fermentation. Our previous work delivered a superior LT starter capable of lowering wine pH by ~0.5 units when used in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC).  Here, we aimed to i) compare the profiles of the bio-acidified LT wines and the acid-adjusted SC wines, and ii) evaluate the use of LT wines as blending components. For this purpose, high sugar/pH Merlot grapes (14.5 ° Bé; pH 3.9) were fermented with a sequential culture of LT and SC, and an SC monoculture control. The two obtained wines blended in three proportions (1:3, 1:1, 3:1), and the aliquots of the SC control (pH 4) were also acidified with either tartaric or lactic acid to the pH of the LT wine (pH 3.5).  Chemical analysis revealed major differences in a range of compositional parameters, which were reflected in the sensory profiles of wines, as confirmed via ‘Rate-All-That-Apply’ evaluation by wine experts (n=30). Sensory profiles of the bio-acidified LT wine and the lactic acid-adjusted SC wine were similar, and contrasting to the tartaric acid-adjusted SC wine. Despite the identical initial matrix, adjustment with lactic acid resulted in intenser ‘red fruit’ flavour, and lower ‘hotness’, ‘bitterness’ and ‘body’ relative to the adjustment with tartaric acid, driven by increases in ‘sourness’. The profiles of blends were modulated depending on the proportion of the bio-acidified wine, thus highlighting the potential of this approach to fine-tune ‘freshness’ and differentiate wine styles.

DOI:

Publication date: April 23, 2021

Issue: Enoforum 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Ana Hranilovic 1, 2; Marina Bely 1; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede 1,3; Warren Albertin 1,4, Vladimir Jiranek 2, 5

1 ISVV, University of Bordeaux, Villenave d’Ornon, France
Department of Wine and Food Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Gradignan, France
ENSCBP, Bordeaux INP, Pessac, France
The Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production, Adelaide, Australia

Contact the author

Tags

Enoforum 2021 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

A meta-analysis of the ecological impact of viticultural practices on soil biodiversity

Viticulture is facing two major challenges – climate change and agroecological transition. The soil plays a pivotal role in these transition processes. Therefore, soil quality and adequate soil management are key levers for an ecologically and economically sustainable viticulture. Over the last 15 years, numerous studies evidenced strong effects of viticultural practices on the soil physical, chemical and biological quality. However, to date a global analysis providing a comprehensive overview of the ecological impacts of viticultural practices on soil biological quality is missing.

Use of glutathione and a selected strain of metschnikowia pulcherrima as alternatives to sulphur dioxide to inhibit natural tyrosinase of grape must and prevent browning

The enzymatic browning of grape must is still a major problem in oenology today [1] being particularly serious when the grapes have been infected by grey rot [2]. Browning is an oxidation process that causes certain foods to turn brown, which often leads to them being rejected by consumers [3]. This is a particular problem in the case of wine, because grape must is very vulnerable to enzymatic browning [4].

Tools for assessing vine nitrogen status; role of nitrogen uptake in the “terroir” effect

Among the numerous nutrients vines extract from the soil, nitrogen is the one that interferes most with vine vigor, yield, berry constitution and wine quality. Many studies relate on the influence of various levels of nitrogen

The role of vine trunk height in delaying grape ripening: insights for viticultural adaptation strategies

Global changes in temperature patterns necessitate the development of viticultural adaptation strategies. One promising approach involves modifying the training system and elevating trunk height. This study explored the potential of raising the vine trunk as an adaptive strategy to counteract the effects of increasing temperatures and delay ripening. Thermal conditions, radiation levels, and must composition were measured at different heights (10 and 150 cm) in a commercial vineyard of the minority variety Maturana Blanca, trained on a vertical cordon.

Data integration via modeling for adaptation to climate change and efficiency breeding in grapevine

Climate can greatly affect grape yield and quality (van Leeuwen et al., 2024). Growing suitable cultivars in a given region and or breed environmental resilient cultivars are essential for maintaining viticulture sustainability, particularly in the face of climate change (Wolkovich et al., 2018).