 IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evolution of flavonols during Merlot winemaking processes

Evolution of flavonols during Merlot winemaking processes

Abstract

Aim: The phenomenon of quercetin precipitation in wine (flanovol haze), has been manifested for many years in several wine-producing regions, such as Italy, Australia, and New Zealand (Gambuti et al., 2020; Lanati, Marchi, & Cascio, 2014; Somers & Ziemelis, 1985). Due to the limited information related to the quercetin aglycone behavior and its precursors during wine production in New Zealand, this study aims to monitor the evolution of flavonols and other polyphenols during the commercial fermentation of Merlot grapes, using different fermentation conditions, and vineyard treatments.

Methods: Various trials evaluating sun exposure, winemaking practices, and winemaking process management were undertaken using Merlot grapes, commercial yeast cultures, potassium metabisulphite (20 g/hL), and nutrient supplementation with DYNASTART®-LAFFORT at 20 g/hL. Samples were taken through the winemaking stages, and the polyphenols were quantified using a reversed-phase HPLC method (Garrido-Bañuelos et al., 2019; Peng et al. 2002).

Results: Grapes with elevated amounts of flavonols glycosides produced wines with higher levels of flavonol glycosides and quercetin. Wines made from grapes with greater sun exposure ended up with more flavonol glycosides (89 mg/L) and quercetin (16 mg/L) than the wines elaborated from less exposed grapes (47 mg/L and 9.4 mg/L, respectively). Certain winemaking practices showed differences in quercetin content, for example using small fermentation (250 kg) (12 mg/L), and large fermentation (five tonnes) (28 mg/L). The data also indicates that tannins and total anthocyanins were present at 786 mg/L and 156 mg/L, respectively, for small-scale ferments, and at 888 mg/L and 363 mg/L, respectively, for large-scale ferments. In evaluating the winemaking process management, the ferment pumped over (largest fermentation volume) exhibited flavonol glycosides and quercetin at the highest concentration (91 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively), compared to the remaining treatments. PMS, enzyme, and PMS plus enzyme, additions lowered the concentration of the flavonols glycosides at the end of the winemaking process (37 mg/L, 42 mg/L, and 43 mg/L, respectively). It was seem that the PMS plus enzyme (15.6 mg/L) increase quecetin in wine when compared to the control, no additions, (12.6 mg/L). The wines treated with enzyme, PMS, and PMS plus enzyme, also had lower concentrations of anthocyanins (215 mg/L, 233 mg/L, and 238 mg/L, respectively) than the control (291 mg/L).

Conclusions

The study confirmed past research on the role of sun exposure in the formation of flavonols in Merlot grapes and wines. Fermentation size can improve the extraction of polyphenols into wine, and the enzyme additions can promote the hydrolysis of flavonol glycosides. In considering winemaking practices to lower flavonol content, the impact on remaining wine phenolics, of importance to wine colour and mouthfeel, also needs to be carefully evaluated.

DOI:

Publication date: September 14, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Cristian Hernandez

School of Chemistry University of Auckland,Paul KILMARTIN, School of Chemistry, University of Auckland Leandro DIAS, School of Food Science, University of Auckland Gianni FLEGO, Villa Maria Estate winery Rebecca DEED, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland

Contact the author

Citation

Biodiversity in the vineyard agroecosystem: exploring systemic approaches

Biodiversity conservation and restoration are essential for guarantee the provision of ecosystem services associated to vineyard agroecosystem such as climate regulation trough carbon sequestration and control of pests and diseases. Most of published research dealing with the complexity of the vineyard agroecosystems emphasizes the necessity of innovative approaches, including the integration of information at different temporal and spatial scales and development of systemic analysis based on modelling. A biodiversity survey was conducted in the Franciacorta wine-growing area (Lombardy, Italy), one of the most important Italian wine-growing regions for sparkling wine production, considering a portion of the territory of 112 ha. The area was divided into several Environmental Units (EUs), defined as a whole vineyard or portion of vineyard homogenous in terms of four agronomic characteristics: planting year, planting density, cultivar, and training system. In each EU a set of compartments was identified and characterised by specific variables. The compartments are meteorology, morphology (altitude, slope, aspect, row orientation, and solar irradiance), ecological infrastructures and management. The landscape surrounding EU was also characterised in terms of land-use in a buffer zone of 500 m. For each component a specific methodology was identified and applied. Different statistical approaches were used to evaluate the method to integrate the information related to different compartments within the EU and related to the buffer zone. These approaches were also preliminarily evaluated for their ability to describe the contribution of biodiversity and landscape components to ecosystem services. This methodological exploration provides useful indication for the development of a fully systemic approach to structural and functional biodiversity in vineyard agroecosystems, contributing to promote a multifunctional perspective for the all wine-growing sector.

Analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon and Aglianico winegrape (V. vinifera L.) responses to different pedo-climatic environments in southern Italy

Water deficit is one of the most important effects of climate change able to affect agricultural sectors. In general, it determines a reduction in biomass production, and for some plants, as in the case of grapevine, it can endorse fruit quality. The monitoring and management of plant water stress in the vineyard

Combining effect of leaf removal and natural shading on grape ripening under two irrigation strategies in Manto negro (Vitis vinifera L.)

The increasingly frequent heat waves during grape ripening pose challenges for high quality wine grape production. Defoliation is a common practice that can improve the control of diseases in bunches, but also it increases the exposure to sunlight. Grapes exposed to solar radiation reach temperatures over the optimum for berry development and maturation. This makes the development of irrigation and canopy management techniques of great importance to maximize yield and grape quality. A field experiment was carried out during 2021 using Manto negro wine grapes to study the effect of applied irrigation and different light exposure levels on grape quality. Two irrigation treatments were imposed based on the frequency and amount of water doses in a four-block experimental vineyard at Bodega Ribas (Mallorca). Three light exposure treatments were randomly applied in each irrigation plot. The light treatments included exposed clusters from pea size, non-exposed clusters, and shaded clusters after softening. Leaf area index and canopy porosity was estimated every 2 weeks. Midday leaf water potential was measured weekly. Additionally, apparent electrical conductivity was measured between rows to estimate the soil water content variability. Light and temperature sensors were installed at the bunch level to quantify the differences in bunch temperature and light intensity among treatments. The effect of irrigation and cluster light exposure on berry weight, TSS, TA, malic acid, tartaric acid, K+, and pH were analysed at 5 moments along grape ripening. During different heat waves, the natural shading technique decreased the maximum bunch temperature around 10 °C respect to the exposed bunches in both irrigation strategies. The combination of defoliation and shading techniques after softening decreased TSS at harvest and affected most of the quality parameters during the last stages of ripening, showing an interesting technique to delay ripening in warm viticulture areas.

Revealing the Barossa zone sub-divisions through sensory and chemical analysis of Shiraz wine

The Barossa zone is arguably one of the most well-recognised wine producing regions in Australia and internationally; known mainly for the production of its distinct Shiraz wines. However, within the broad Barossa geographical delimitation, a variation in terroir can be perceived and is expressed as sensorial and chemical profile differences between wines. This study aimed to explore the sub-division classification across the Barossa region using chemical and sensory measurements. Shiraz grapes from 4 different vintages and different vineyards across the Barossa (2018, n = 69; 2019, n = 72; 2020, n = 79; 2021, n = 64) were harvested and made using a standardised small lot winemaking procedure. The analysis involved a sensory descriptive analysis with a highly trained panel and chemical measurement including basic chemistry (e.g. pH, TA, alcohol content, total SO2), phenolic composition, volatile compounds, metals, proline, and polysaccharides. The datasets were combined and analysed through an unsupervised, clustering analysis. Firstly, each vintage was considered separately to investigate any vintage to vintage variation. The datasets were then combined and analysed as a whole. The number of sub-divisions based on the measurements were identified and characterised with their sensory and chemical profile and some consistencies were seen between the vintages. Preliminary analysis of the sensory results showed that in most vintages, two major groups could be identified characterised with one group showing a fruit-forward profile and another displaying savoury and cooked vegetables characters. The exploration of distinct profiles arising from the Barossa wine producing region will provide producers with valuable information about the regional potential of their wine assisting with tools to increase their target market and reputation. This study will also provide a robust and comprehensive basis to determine the distinctive terroir characteristics which exist within the Barossa wine producing region.

Impact of geographical location on the phenolic profile of minority varieties grown in Spain. II: red grapevines

Because terroir and cultivar are drivers of wine quality, is essential to investigate theirs effects on polyphenolic profile before promoting the implantation of a red minority variety in a specific area. This work, included in MINORVIN project, focuses in the polyphenolic profile of 7 red grapevines minority varieties of Vitis vinifera L. (Morate, Sanguina, Santafe, Terriza Tinta Jeromo Tortozona Tinta) and Tempranillo) from six typical viticulture Spanish areas: Aragón (A1), Cataluña (A2), Castilla la Mancha (A3), Castilla –León (A4), Madrid (A5) and Navarra (A6) of 2020 season. Polyphenolic substances were extracted from grapes. 35 compounds were identified and quantified (mg subtance/kg fresh berry) by HPLC and grouped in anthocyanins (ANT) flavanols (FLAVA), flavonols (FLAVO), hydroxycinnamic (AH), benzoic (BA) acids and stilbenes (ST). Antioxidant activity (AA, mmol TE /g fresh berry) was determined by DPPH method. The results were submitted to a two-way ANOVA to investigate the influence of variety, area and their interaction for each polyphenolic family and cluster analysis was used to construct hierarchical dendrograms, searching the natural groupings among the samples. Sanguina (A3) had the most of total polyphenols while Tempranillo (A5) those of ANT. Sanguina (A2) and (A3) reached the highest values of FLAVO, FLAVA and AA. These two last samples had also the maximum of AA. The effect cultivar and area were significant for all polyphenolic families analyzed. A high variability due to variety (>50%) was observed in FLAVA and the maximum value of variability due to growing area was detected in AA (86.41%), ANT and FLAVO (51%); the interaction variety*zone was significant only for ANT, FLAVO, EST and AA. Finally, dendrograms presented five cluster: i) Sanguina (A2); ii) Sanguina (A3); iii) Tempranillo (A5); iv) Tempranillo (A3); Terriza (A3,A5), Morate (A5,A6); v) Santafé (A1,A6); Tortozona tinta (A1,A3,A6); Tinta Jeromo (A3,A4).