Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evolution of flavonols during Merlot winemaking processes

Evolution of flavonols during Merlot winemaking processes

Abstract

Aim: The phenomenon of quercetin precipitation in wine (flanovol haze), has been manifested for many years in several wine-producing regions, such as Italy, Australia, and New Zealand (Gambuti et al., 2020; Lanati, Marchi, & Cascio, 2014; Somers & Ziemelis, 1985). Due to the limited information related to the quercetin aglycone behavior and its precursors during wine production in New Zealand, this study aims to monitor the evolution of flavonols and other polyphenols during the commercial fermentation of Merlot grapes, using different fermentation conditions, and vineyard treatments.

Methods: Various trials evaluating sun exposure, winemaking practices, and winemaking process management were undertaken using Merlot grapes, commercial yeast cultures, potassium metabisulphite (20 g/hL), and nutrient supplementation with DYNASTART®-LAFFORT at 20 g/hL. Samples were taken through the winemaking stages, and the polyphenols were quantified using a reversed-phase HPLC method (Garrido-Bañuelos et al., 2019; Peng et al. 2002).

Results: Grapes with elevated amounts of flavonols glycosides produced wines with higher levels of flavonol glycosides and quercetin. Wines made from grapes with greater sun exposure ended up with more flavonol glycosides (89 mg/L) and quercetin (16 mg/L) than the wines elaborated from less exposed grapes (47 mg/L and 9.4 mg/L, respectively). Certain winemaking practices showed differences in quercetin content, for example using small fermentation (250 kg) (12 mg/L), and large fermentation (five tonnes) (28 mg/L). The data also indicates that tannins and total anthocyanins were present at 786 mg/L and 156 mg/L, respectively, for small-scale ferments, and at 888 mg/L and 363 mg/L, respectively, for large-scale ferments. In evaluating the winemaking process management, the ferment pumped over (largest fermentation volume) exhibited flavonol glycosides and quercetin at the highest concentration (91 mg/L and 20 mg/L, respectively), compared to the remaining treatments. PMS, enzyme, and PMS plus enzyme, additions lowered the concentration of the flavonols glycosides at the end of the winemaking process (37 mg/L, 42 mg/L, and 43 mg/L, respectively). It was seem that the PMS plus enzyme (15.6 mg/L) increase quecetin in wine when compared to the control, no additions, (12.6 mg/L). The wines treated with enzyme, PMS, and PMS plus enzyme, also had lower concentrations of anthocyanins (215 mg/L, 233 mg/L, and 238 mg/L, respectively) than the control (291 mg/L). 

Conclusions

The study confirmed past research on the role of sun exposure in the formation of flavonols in Merlot grapes and wines. Fermentation size can improve the extraction of polyphenols into wine, and the enzyme additions can promote the hydrolysis of flavonol glycosides. In considering winemaking practices to lower flavonol content, the impact on remaining wine phenolics, of importance to wine colour and mouthfeel, also needs to be carefully evaluated.

DOI:

Publication date: September 14, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Cristian Hernandez

School of Chemistry University of Auckland,Paul KILMARTIN, School of Chemistry, University of Auckland Leandro DIAS, School of Food Science, University of Auckland Gianni FLEGO, Villa Maria Estate winery Rebecca DEED, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland

Contact the author

Citation

Related articles…

Analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon and Aglianico winegrape (V. vinifera L.) responses to different pedo-climatic environments in southern Italy

Water deficit is one of the most important effects of climate change able to affect agricultural sectors. In general, it determines a reduction in biomass production, and for some plants, as in the case of grapevine, it can endorse fruit quality. The monitoring and management of plant water stress in the vineyard

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.

Co-design and evaluation of spatially explicit strategies of adaptation to climate change in a Mediterranean watershed

Climate change challenges differently wine growing systems, depending on their biophysical, sociological and economic features. Therefore, there is a need to locally design and evaluate adaptation strategies combining several technical options, and considering the local opportunities and constraints (e.g. water access, wine typicity). The case study took place in a typical and heterogeneous Mediterranean vineyard of 1,500 ha in the South of France. We developed a participatory modeling approach to (1) conceptualize local climate change issues and design spatially explicit adaptation strategies with stakeholders, (2) numerically evaluate their effects on phenology, yield and irrigation needs under the high-emissions climate change scenario RCP 8.5, and (3) collectively discuss simulation results. We organized five sets of workshops, with in-between modeling phases. A process-based model was developed that allowed to evaluate the effects of six technical options (late varieties, irrigation, water saving by reducing canopy size, adjusting cover cropping, reducing density, and shading) with various distributions in the watershed, as well as vineyard relocation. Overall, we co-designed three adaptation strategies. Delay harvest strategy with late varieties showed little effects on decreasing air temperature during ripening. Water constraint limitation strategy would compensate for production losses if disruptive adaptations (e.g. reduced density) were adopted, and more land got access to irrigation. Relocation strategy would foster high premium wine production in the constrained mountainous areas where grapevine is less impacted by climate change. This research shows that a spatial distribution of technical changes gives room for adaptation to climate change, and that the collaboration with local stakeholders is a key to the identification of relevant adaptation. Further research should explore the potential of adaptation strategies based on soil quality improvement and on water stress tolerant varieties.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

The impact of leaf canopy management on eco-physiology, wood chemical properties and microbial communities in root, trunk and cordon of Riesling grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)

In the last decades, climate change required already adaptation of vineyard management. Increase in temperature and unexpected weather events cause changes in all phenological stages requiring new management tools. For example, defoliation can be a useful tool to reduce the sugar content in the berries creating differences in the wine profiles. In a ten-year field experiment using Riesling (Vitis vinifera L, planted 1986, Geisenheim, Germany), various mechanical defoliation strategies and different intensities were trialed until 2016 before the vineyard was uprooted. Wood was sampled from the plant compartments root, trunk, cordon and shoot for analyses of physicochemical properties (e.g. lignin and element content, pH, diameter), nonstructural carbohydrates and the microbial communities. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of reduced canopy leaf area on the sink-source allocation into different compartments and potential changes of the fungal and prokaryotic wood-inhabiting community using a metabarcoding approach. Severe summer pruning (SSP) of the canopy and mechanical defoliation (MDC) above the bunch zone decreased the leaf area by 50% compared to control (C). SSP reduced the photosynthetic capacity, which resulted in an altered source-sink allocation and carbohydrate storage. With lower leaf area, less carbohydrates are allocated. This for example resulted in a decreased trunk diameter. Further, it affected the composition of the grapevine wood microbiota. SSP and MDC management changed significantly the prokaryotic community composition in wood of the root samples, but had no effect in other compartments. In general, this study found strong compartment and less management effects of the microbial community composition and associated physicochemical properties. The highest microbial diversities were identified in the wood of the trunk, and several species were recorded the first time in grapevine.