Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2021 9 Chemical diversity of 'special' wine styles: fortified wines, passito style, botrytized and ice wines, orange wines, sparkling wines 9 What is the best time to harvest grapes destined for withering? Ripeness and dehydration length affect phenolic composition of Nebbiolo grapes

What is the best time to harvest grapes destined for withering? Ripeness and dehydration length affect phenolic composition of Nebbiolo grapes

Abstract

AIM: Sfursat di Valtellina is a DOCG reinforced wine produced in Valtellina from partially withered red grapes of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Nebbiolo. The grape ripeness degree and the dehydration process strongly influence the physicochemical characteristics of grapes [1, 2, 3]. In particular, grape skin and seeds contain several classes of phenolic compounds strictly associated with red wine quality, which are significantly affected by these factors [4]. The aim of this research is to assess the combined influence of different ripeness levels and withering rates on the standard chemical composition and phenolic profile of winegrape in order to provide new insights and approaches to the management of withering, searching for the valorization of grape potentialities.

METHODS: During a two-year study (vintages 2019 and 2020) three binomials have been tested: early harvest/long withering (EL), medium-term harvest/medium-term withering (MM) and late harvest/short withering (LS). Grape samples of cv. Nebbiolo from two vineyards at different locations (Valtellina upper and lower valley) were harvested and placed into a typical ‘fruttaio’ dehydration room, following the wine type designation guidelines. Grape must composition, mechanical parameters and extractable phenolic profiles (total polyphenols, total anthocyanins, total flavonoids and methylcellulose tannin assay) of grape skins and seeds were studied before and after the withering process.

RESULTS: At the end of withering, EL thesis showed the highest values of sugars and acidity, and the lowest pH. The content of total polyphenols, flavonoids, and tannins in seeds showed a decreasing trend by leaving the grapes on the plant longer, whereas their impact increased considerably after withering with respect to fresh samples, due to berry dehydration. Instead, the skin phenolic compounds were less influenced by harvest period, but their concentrations on grape weight increased after withering. Skin extractable anthocyanins experienced a distinct trend for the two vineyards studied: their concentration increased in withered samples from the upper-valley vineyard and decreased in those from the lower-valley. The grapes mechanical properties may have influenced this aspect, as previously demonstrated [5]. Finally, the differences highlighted between the three binomials studied were more noticeable in vintage 2019 rather than in 2020, probably due to the higher rainfall in the final stage of grape ripening in vintage 2020.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this research, the combined effect of ripeness degree and withering process length have been studied. The results obtained shows that these two variables can be modulated according to the desired oenological objective. In general, early/medium harvest and long/medium withering gave the best results, particularly for seeds polyphenols, although the vineyard location and the weather conditions of the year influenced the withered grape phenolic characteristics.

DOI:

Publication date: September 16, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Giulia Scalzini

University of Torino, Italy,Maria Alessandra PAISSONI, University of Torino, Italy Simone GIACOSA, University of Torino, Italy Danilo DROCCO, Cantina Nino Negri, Italy Aldo RAINOLDI, Casa Vinicola Aldo Rainoldi, Italy Diego ORTIZ JACOB, University of Torino, Italy Giovanni BITELLI, University of Torino, Italy Susana RÍO SEGADE, University of Torino, Italy Vincenzo GERBI, University of Torino, Italy Luca ROLLE, University of Torino, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

postharvest withered grapes, phenolic compounds, withering process, sfursat di valtellina, sforzato, reinforced wines, special wines

Citation

Related articles…

Do natural wines differ from conventionally-produced wines?

In recent years, consumer awareness for consuming healthy and environmental sustainability products has considerably increased [1]. In an ever-changing and highly competitive environment such as the wine sector, production of wines without sulfites, or biodynamic, organic or vegan wines, has experienced an important increase to meet the new needs of consumers [2,3]. Beyond these categories of regulated products, a new concept has emerged: natural wines (NW), for which there is not an established definition or legal regulation. Rather, producers have a personal idea of naturalness under the premise of applying minimal intervention from grape to wine production [4]. In this context, it is hypothesized that self-defined natural wines are different from conventional wines (CW) in their sensory and chemical profile. The predicament of natural wine is based on anecdotic declarations and assumes that minimal intervention guarantees the production of wines with organoleptic properties able to express the “terroir” and thus promote wine diversity, plurality and sensory typicity against the risk of standardization of CW.

Testing the pathogen e-learning and field training course on grapevine virus knowledge and management

One of the reasons of the spread of grapevine virus diseases in
vineyards around the world is the lack of knowledge by the main actors of the wine sector. To face this problem, five partners worked together to develop the PAThOGEN project, a training program aimed to improve grapevine virus knowledge and management. The partnership gathers one French technical center (IFV), one Spanish university (USC), one Italian applied research center (CREA), one Spanish foundation
specialized in training and technology transfer (FEUGA) and one Italian SME specialized in the development of informatics tools and in knowledge transfer (HORTA).The objectives of PAThOGEN are: (i) to develop and
maintain a high-quality work-based Vocational and Education Training program, (ii) to improve the skills of professionals of the wine sector.

DNA-Free genome editing confers disease resistance in grapevine

Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera L.), one of the most important cultivated fruit crops, is facing significant challenges due to climate change. Specifically, increasing temperatures negatively impact the physiological traits and disrupt plant phenology. Additionally, increased virulence in pathogen attacks and pests leads to significant yield loss, requiring widespread application of plant protection products. Traditional agronomic practices offer only partial mitigation, requiring the development of precise and effective intervention strategies. The economic worth of viticulture has prompted continuous efforts in grapevine genetic improvement programs, traditionally involving conventional breeding and clonal selection that, however, are complex and time-consuming approaches.

Novel analytical technologies for wine fingerprinting in and beyond the laboratory

For characterization, sensory designing and authentication rapid analytical technologies have become available. Some, like Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry allow a rapid spectrum of the volatile compounds of wines. Combined with chemometrics wines can be characterized. The same approach can be used to calculate the results of virtual mixtures and allow formulation of constant quality blends. Other new techniques and portable devices based on spectroscopy allow measurements on production sites and in grocery stores, even for the smart consumer. We will present some examples of the application of these techniques for authentication of wines, both in the laboratory and on site.

Effect of rising atmospheric CO2 levels on grapevine yield and composition by the middle of the 21st century: what can we learn from the VineyardFACE?

Atmospheric CO2 levels have been rising continuously since the industrial revolution, affecting crop physiology, yield and quality of harvest products, and grapevine is no exception [1]. Most of previously reported studies used potted plants in controlled environments, and explored grapevine response to relatively high CO2 levels, 700 ppm or more. The vineyardFACE, established in Geisenheim in 2012, uses a free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) system to simulate a moderate (ambient +20%) increase in atmospheric CO2 in a vineyard planted with cvs. Cabernet-Sauvignon and Riesling grafted on rootstock 161-49 Couderc and SO4, respectively.