Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Adsorption capacity of phenolics compounds by polyaniline materials in model solution

Adsorption capacity of phenolics compounds by polyaniline materials in model solution

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this work was to study the trapping capacity of four polyaniline polymers towards phenolic compounds in wine-like model solutions.

METHODS: The model wine solution was composed of 12% (v/v) and 4 g/L of tartaric acid adjusted to pH = 3.6. A series of centrifuge tubes (15 mL) were filled with 10 mL of model solution enriched with 50 mg/L of five phenolic compounds (i.e., Gallic acid, caffeic acid, (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, and rutin), and treated with different doses of PANI polymer (i.e., 0, 2, 4 and 8 g/L). After the addition of the polymer, the samples were stirred using a platform shaker at room temperature (20 ºC) for 2, 8, 16 and 24 h. All treatments included three replications. The synthesis and characterization of polyaniline emeraldine base (PANI-EB) and different PANI 50, 100, 150 (polyaniline-PVPP composites where 50, 100, 150 are amount of PVPP) was prepared according to what was reported by Marican et al. (2014). Once the selected contact times were over, the samples were filtered and were by HPLC-DAD, following the methodology described by Gómez-Alonso et al. (2007). In brief, the separation was performed using a reverse-phased LiChrosorb® RP-18 (5 μm) column (250 mm × 4 mm ID) operating at 20 ºC. The injection volume was 25 μL, and for detection and quantification of compounds, the chromatograms were recorded at 280, 320 and 360 nm.

RESULTS: Regardless of the polymer used, the compounds having more affinity for PANI were gallic and caffeic acid, whereas rutin and (+)-catechin were the least removed. For instance, the adsorption percentage of gallic and caffeic acid, with a 4 g/L PANI concentration and 8 h of contact time, reached more than 90% whereas the removal of rutin was lower than 40%. Instead, the phenolic concertation of the samples where no polymer was added (0 g/L of PANI) remain stable over time, very close to 50 mg /L for each of the phenols evaluated. As expected, the concentration of the five phenols decreased as the contact time increased. As an example, a 2 g/L addition of PANI 50 produced a reduction of (-)-epicatechin concentration of 17 mg/L after 8 h of contact time and 25 mg/L after 24 h. Like so, the decrease in the concentration of all phenols was greater when more polymer was added.

CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained suggest that PANI Polymers could be an interesting alternative for analytical or experimental applications in which polyphenolcs need to be removed.

DOI:

Publication date: September 28, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

María Navarro, JOHN AMALRAJ, V. FELIPE LAURIE

Talca University

Contact the author

Keywords

pani polymers, phenols, model wine solutions

Citation

Related articles…

Spatial characterisation of terrain units in the Bottelaryberg-Simonsberg-Helderberg wine growing area (South Africa)

The first South African wine was made by Jan van Riebeeck on the second of February 1659. His initial determination to produce wine at the Cape refreshment station was continued by other governors

Plant fibers in comparison with other fining agents for the re-duction of pesticide residues and the effect on the volitile profile of Austrian white and red wines.

Pesticide residues in Austrian wines have so far been poorly documented. In 250 wines, 33 grape musts and 45 musts in fermentation, no limit values were exceeded, but in some cases high lev-els (>0.100 mg/l) of single residues were found, meaning that a reduction of these levels before bottling could make sense. In the course of this study, a white and a red wine were spiked with a mix of 23 pesticide residues from the group of fungicides (including botryticides), herbicides and insecticides. The influence of the following treatments on residue concentrations and volatile profiles were investigated: two activated charcoal products, a bentonite clay, two commer-cial mixed fining agents made of bentonite and charcoal, two yeast cell wall products, and a plant fiber-based novel filter additive. The results of this study show that all the agents tested reduced both residues and aromavolatile compounds in wine, with activated charcoal having the strongest effect and bentonite the weakest. The mixed agents and yeast wall products showed less aroma losses than charcoal products, but also lower residue reduction. Plant fibers showed good reduction of pesticides with moderate aroma damage, but these results need to be con-firmed under practical conditions.

Bio-protection by one strain of M. Pulcherrima: microbiological and chemical impacts in red wines

In oenology, bio-protection consists in adding bacteria, yeasts or a mixture of microorganisms on grape must before fermentation in order to reduce the use of chemical compounds such as sulphites.

Berry shrivel causes – summarizing current hypotheses

Diverse ripening disorders affect grapevine resulting in high economic losses worldwide. The common obvious symptom is shriveling berries, however the shriveling pattern and the consequences for berry quality traits are distinct in each disorder. Among them, the disorder berry shrivel is characterized by a reduced sugar accumulation short after the onset of berry ripening leaving the clusters unsuitable for wine processing. Although our knowledge on BS increased recently, potential internal or external triggers contributing to the induction of BS are yet to be explored.

Chemical markers in wine related to low levels of yeast available nitrogen in the grape

Nitrogen is an important nutrient of yeast and its low content in grape must is a major cause for sluggish fermentations. To prevent problems during fermentation, a supplementation of the must with ammonium salts or more complex nitrogen mixtures is practiced in the cellar. However this correction seems to improve only partially the quality of wine [1]. In fact, yeast is using nitrogen in many of its metabolic pathways and depending of the sort of the nitrogen source (ammonium or amino acids) it produces different flavor active compounds. A limitation in amino acids can lead to a change in the metabolic pathways of yeast and consequently alter wine quality.