Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 What is the best soil for Sangiovese quality wine?

What is the best soil for Sangiovese quality wine?

Abstract

Sangiovese is one of the main cultivar in the Italian ampelographic outline and it occupies more than 60% of total vineyard surface in the Tuscany region. It is also well known that the environmental variability causes an important influence over the viticultural and oenological results of Sangiovese, which does not have strict genetic control over the vegetal-productive behaviour.
The aim of this work was to single out the best soil characteristics for Sangiovese quality, on the basis of the vine performance of Sangiovese (VPS). For this purpose, a matching table, considering eight viticultural parameters, was utilized. The matching table permitted to classify the selected parameters into three classes of decreasing vine performance. A set of 79 experimental plots, sited on 47 farms, were utilized during a time span varying from two to five years (1989-1992; 1993-1994; 1997-2000; 2002-2007 and 2008-2009). Two datasets were created. One considering all the invariant soil and topography characteristics of the plots. The second, storing the year-depended variables. The data were submitted to principal component analysis (PCA) to highlight those invariant and year-depended climate and pedoclimate variables which were significantly correlated with the average values of the VPS of each vineyard. Discriminant Analysis was employed to identify the most significant variables and their discriminating power on VPS.
The results highlighted that invariant site characteristics are the most discriminant at the province level, while climate and pedoclimate show their influence on VPS at more detailed scales. At the province level, VPS is significantly influenced by rock fragments, stoniness, available water capacity (AWC), and elevation. The ideal soil for Sangiovese in the province of Siena is placed between 315 and 335 m asl, has an AWC ranging from 110 and 120 mm, shows a limited surficial stoniness of about 8-10%, and it is rather skeletal (rock fragments content 12-16%).
These results can be used in land evaluation and vine zoning, in particular, for the selection of the best crus of the province, they may help the choice of land for a new vine planting, but they might be also used in pedotechnique, that is, in the creation of vineyard soils by means of earth movements.

 

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

P. Bucelli (1), R. Barbetti (1), G. L’Abate (1), S. Pellegrini (1), P. Storchi (2), E.A.C. Costantini (1)

(1) Agricultural Research Council. Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology – Piazza M. D’ Azeglio, 30 – 50121 Firenze, Italy
(2) Agricultural Research Council. Research Unite for Viticulture – SOP – Via Romea 53 – 52020 Arezzo, Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

soil, climate, grape, red wine, Tuscany

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Physiological and growth reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt to row orientation and soil water status

Advanced knowledge on grapevine row orientation is required to improve establishment, management and outcomes of vineyards on terroirs with different environmental conditions (climate, soil, topography) and in view of a future change to more extreme climatic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the combined effect of row orientation, plant water status and ripeness level on the physiological and viticultural reaction of Shiraz/101-14 Mgt.

Effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California

San Joaquin Valley accounts for 40% of wine grape acreage and produces 70% of wine grape in California. Fruit quality is one of most important factors which impact the economical sustainability of farming wine grapes in this region. Due to the recent drought and expected labor cost increase, the wine industry is thrilled to understand how to improve fruit quality while maintaining the yield with less water and labor input. The present study aims to study the interactive effects of mechanical leafing and deficit irrigation on yield and berry compositions of Cabernet Sauvignon grown in warm climate of California.

The effects of cane girdling on berry texture properties and the concentration of some aroma compounds in three table grape cultivars

The marketability of the table grapes is highly influenced by the consumer demand; therefore the market value of the table grapes is mainly characterized by its berry size, colour, taste and texture. Girdling could cause accumulation of several components in plants above the ringing of the phloem including clusters and resulting improved maturity. The aim of the experiments was to examine the effect of girdling on berry texture characteristics and aroma concentration.

Application of a fluorescence-based method to evaluate the ripening process and quality of Pinot Blanc grape

The chemical composition of grape berries at harvest is one of the most important factors that should be considered to produce high quality wines. Among the different chemical classes which characterize the grape juice, the polyphenolic compound, such as flavonoids, contribute to the final taste and color of wines. Recently, an innovative non-destructive method, based on chlorophyll fluorescence, was developed to estimate the phenolic maturity of red grape varieties through the evaluation of anthocyanins accumulated in the berry skin. To date, only few data are available about the application of this method on white grape varieties.

Different yield regulation strategies in semi-minimal-pruned hedge (SMPH) and impact on bunch architecture

Yields in the novel viticulture training system Semi-Minimal-Pruned Hedge (SMPH) are generally higher compared to the traditional Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP). Excessive yields have a negative impact on the vine and wine quality, which can result in substantial losses in yield in subsequent vintages (alternate bearing) or penalties in fruit quality. Therefore yield regulation is essential. The bunch architecture in SMPH differs from VSP. Generally there is a higher amount but smaller bunches with lower single berry weights in SMPH compared to VSP.