Measurement of grape vine growth for model evaluation

Abstract

Within a research project for simulating the nitrogen turnover in vineyard soils and the nitrogen uptake by the grape vine, a previously developed plant growth model (Nendel and Kersebaum 2004) had to be evaluated. A dataset was obtained from a monitoring experiment at three vineyard sites with different soil types, conducted in the years 2003 and 2004. The annual plant growth was measured by collecting non-perennial organs of 10 plants at 5 growth stages (pre-blossoming, setting, bunches closed, veraison, and ready for picking). The dry matter content of leaves, flower/grape clusters, shoots, side shoots, and tipping shoots was determined separately. Leaf area was measured before drying. At one vineyard site the plant fresh weight was additionally recorded. Simultaneously, soil water and Nmin content were analysed in soil samples taken from 0-30 and 30-60 cm soil depth.

The weather conditions during the investigation were extreme. At all sites the long-term annual mean temperature was exceeded by more than 1°C, during the growth period even by more than 3°C. In the same time precipitation delivered only about 60% of the long-term average. Drought occurred especially during the spring months. Vitis vinifera commonly reacts to drought by producing abscisine acid which causes a growth reduction of the vegetative plant organs. The generative parts remain less strongly affected. At two of the monitoring sites these effects could be observed as expected, while at the third site plant growth was not limited because of permanent supply of ground water in the rooting zone. At the sites limited in water supply the shoot dry matter production was reduced to up to 48% of the production observed in the years 1999-2001. Grape dry matter was only reduced to up to 59% of the earlier recorded amount. The data were used to parameterise the model to be able to reproduce plant growth under drought conditions. A clear improvement compared to the previous plant growth model version could be achieved. Now, the biomass development of the vine is a new feature in the output of the extended version of N-VINO 2.0 simulating the nitrogen turnover in vineyard soils and completes the output data of Nmin, soil water content, and N-leaching. The results can be presented in a time scale, in relation to soil depth, or as a comparison of measured data versus simulated data.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2006

Type: Article

Authors

Claas NENDEL (1) and Stephan REUTER (2)

(1) Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Department of Modelling and Knowledge Transfer, Theodor Echtermeyer-Weg 1, D-14979 Großbeeren, Germany
(2) Rhineland-Palatinate AgroScience, Institute for AgroEcology, Breitenweg 71, D-67435 Neustadt, Germany

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2006

Citation

Related articles…

Valorization of grape marc in a biorefinery loop for producing short- and medium-chain fatty acids, hydrogen, and methane, with polyphenol recovery

Global grape production amounts to approximately 70 million tons per year, with Europe contributing 61% of the world’s wine output, primarily from Italy, France, and Spain.

Analysis of mousy off-flavour wines

Winemakers are increasingly experimenting with new techniques, such as spontaneous fermentation, prolonged yeast contact, higher pH, minimal sulphur dioxid, filtration and clarification or oxidative ageing. Along with this, the risk of microbial spoilage increases, and so the off-flavour mousiness, long time underestimated, is becoming more frequent. Characteristic of the mousy off-flavour is the delayed perception after swallowing the wine. After a few seconds the flavour appears, reminiscent of a dirty mouse cage. There are three known compounds that cause mousy off-flavor: 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine, 2-acetyltetrahydopyridine, and 2-acetylpyrroline. Yeasts such as Dekkera/Brettanomyces and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria like Lactobacillus hilgardii can release these compounds.

Impact of environmental conditions in vscs production during wine fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The aroma of wine is one of the most important determinants of quality as it strongly influences the consumer’s acceptance or rejection. Among the thousands of molecules comprising the wine aroma, sulfur-containing compounds can be considered as a “double-edged sword”: some of them, deriving from varietal precursors provide fruity pleasant aromas, while other ones, produced by yeast metabolism are related to “unpleasant” aromas

The Soil Component of Terroir

Evidence for a specific effect of soil mineral composition on wine character is largely anecdotal. However, soil potassium supply to the vine must be properly balanced between deficiency and excess for good fruit quality.

Selective and sensitive quantification of wine biogenic amines using a dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up/concentration method

Biogenic amines exist in numerous foods, including wine. They can have aliphatic (putrescine, cadaverine, spermine, and spermidine), aromatic (tyramine and phenylethylamine) and heterocyclic structure (histamine and tryptamine)