WAC 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 WAC 9 WAC 2022 9 2 - WAC - Oral presentations 9 Entre ce que les consommateurs disent, ce qu’ils apprécient et ce qu’ils achètent… où se situent les vins de chasselas ?

Entre ce que les consommateurs disent, ce qu’ils apprécient et ce qu’ils achètent… où se situent les vins de chasselas ?

Abstract

Originaire du bassin lémanique, le chasselas est l’emblème de la viticulture suisse. Pour autant, les surfaces de chasselas n’ont cessé de diminuer, passant de 6’585 hectares en 1986 à près de 3’600 aujourd’hui, reflet d’une baisse de consommation. Une récente étude a cherché à comprendre les raisons de ce désintérêt. Réalisée dans différents cantons, nous avons souhaité savoir si la frontière linguistique et culturelle entre Suisse francophone et germanophone permet d’expliquer le comportement des consommateurs. Cette présentation s’articulera en deux parties. 

La première partie consistera en l’étude des représentations, des attentes et des motivations à consommer du chasselas. Lors de six séances de Focus group, nous avons ressorti plusieurs thématiques quant à son image, la connaissance et les manières de boire des vins de chasselas. Ces points ont été repris dans un questionnaire en ligne complété par près de 1100 personnes. Il apparait une nette méconnaissance du chasselas chez les consommateurs germanophones. A l’inverse, ce cépage semble familier et globalement apprécié par les consommateurs francophones. De même, les occasions et la fréquence de consommation restent très contrastés entre les deux régions. Les profils sensoriels que les consommateurs déclarent apprécier diffèrent avec une recherche de minéralité par les francophones alors que les germanophones vont plutôt rechercher des vins fruités. Bien que la capsule-à-vis soit une tradition pour le chasselas, son image reste ambiguë. Étonnement, le consentement à payer est similaire entre les deux régions bien que son importance dans l’acte d’achat diffère. 

La seconde partie s’intéressera à l’appréciation sensorielle de sept styles de vins par plus de 300 consommateurs. Au-delà de l’acceptabilité des vins, les participants devaient également les décrire parmi une liste d’attributs sensoriels (CATA). Ils devaient aussi définir leur profil sociologique de dégustateur de vins. L’ensemble de ces informations a été analysé conjointement afin de ressortir plusieurs types de consommateurs. 

Les résultats, allant des attentes des consommateurs à ce qu’ils aiment boire, apportent des éléments concrets aux professionnels suisses. Au-delà de la frontière linguistique et du cas suisse, c’est surtout la comparaison de deux régions qui est mise en avant ; l’une où les consommateurs sont proches du vignoble et l’autre où ils en sont éloignés, reflétant des connaissances et des implications différentes.

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2022

Issue: WAC 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Pascale Deneulin, Pierrick Rébénaque, Eve Danthe, Laure Jaquier, Charlotte Bourcet, Franziska Götze, Pauline Rouchon, Christine Brombach, Marie-Louise Cezanne

Presenting author

Pascale Deneulin – Changins, Viticulture and Oenology, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland

Changins, Viticulture and Oenology, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland | Berner Fachhochschule, Haute Ecole des Sciences Agronomiques, Forestières & Alimentaires HAFL | Zurich University of Applied Sciences

Contact the author

Keywords

Focus group – tests consommateurs – questionnaire

Tags

IVES Conference Series | WAC 2022

Citation

Related articles…

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Assessment of the impact of actions in the vineyard and its surrounding environment on biodiversity in Rioja Alavesa (Spain)

Traditional viticulture areas have experienced in the last decades an intensification of field practices, linked to an increased use of fertilisers and phytosanitary products, and to a more intensive mechanization and uniformization of the landscape. This change in management has sometimes led to higher rates of soil erosion andloss of soil structure, fertility decline, groundwater contamination, and to an increased pressure of pests and diseases. Additionally, intensification usually leads to a simplification of landscapes, of particular concern in prestigious wine grape regions where the economical revenue encourages the conversion of land use from natural habitats to high value wine grape production. To revert this trend, it is necessary that growers implement actions that promote biodiversity in their vineyards. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of the implementation of cover crops, vegetational corridors, dry stone walls and vineyard biodiversity hotspots estimated through the study of arthropods. The work has been carried out in four vineyards in Rioja Alavesa belonging to Ostatu winery, where these infrastructures were implemented in 2020. The presence and diversity of arthropods was studied by capturing them at different times in the season and at different distances from the infrastructure using pit-fall traps in the soil and yellow, white and blue chromatic traps at the canopy level. This is a preliminary study in which all adult insects were sorted to the taxonomic level of order and Coleoptera were classified to morphospecies. The results obtained show that there is a relationship between the basic characteristics of the vineyard and the arthropods captured, with a positive effect, although also dependent on the vineyard, of the presence of infrastructure.

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Frost risk projections in a changing climate are highly sensitive in time and space to frost modelling approaches

Late spring frost is a major challenge for various winegrowing regions across the world, its occurrence often leading to important yield losses and/or plant failure. Despite a significant increase in minimum temperatures worldwide, the spatial and temporal evolution of spring frost risk under a warmer climate remains largely uncertain. Recent projections of spring frost risk for viticulture in Europe throughout the 21st century show that its evolution strongly depends on the model approach used to simulate budburst. Furthermore, the frost damage modelling methods used in these projections are usually not assessed through comparison to field observations and/or frost damage reports.
The present study aims at comparing frost risk projections simulated using six spring frost models based on two approaches: a) models considering a fixed damage threshold after the predicted budburst date (e.g BRIN, Smoothed-Utah, Growing Degree Days, Fenovitis) and b) models considering a dynamic frost sensitivity threshold based on the predicted grapevine winter/spring dehardening process (e.g. Ferguson model). The capability of each model to simulate an actual frost event for the Vitis vinifera cv. Chadonnay B was previously assessed by comparing simulated cold thermal stress to reports of events with frost damage in Chablis, the northernmost winegrowing region of Burgundy. Models exhibited scores of κ > 0.65 when reproducing the frost/non-frost damage years and an accuracy ranging from 0.82 to 0.90.
Spring frost risk projections throughout the 21st century were performed for all winegrowing subregions of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté under two CMIP5 concentration pathways (4.5 and 8.5) using statistically downscaled 8×8 km daily air temperature and humidity of 13 climate models. Contrasting results with region-specific spring frost risk trends were observed. Three out of five models show a decrease in the frequency of frost years across the whole study area while the other two show an increase that is more or less pronounced depending on winegrowing subregion. Our findings indicate that the lack of accuracy in grapevine budburst and dehardening models makes climate projections of spring frost risk highly uncertain for grapevine cultivation regions.

The use of rootstock as a lever in the face of climate change and dieback of vineyard

As viticulture faces challenges such as climate change or vineyard dieback, the choice of the variety and rootstock becomes more and more crucial. To study rootstock levers in the Bordeaux region, a parcel of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) was planted with four rootstocks in 2014. Twenty repetitions of each of the following four rootstocks were set up: 101-14 MGt, Nemadex AB, 420A MGt and Gravesac. The number of bunches, yields and pruning weights of the vine shoots were measured individually on 240 vines from 2017 to 2021. Since 2020, nitrogen status assessed by assimilable nitrogen level, hydric status assessed by δ13C and berry maturity were measured on 80 samples taken from 20 repetitions of the four rootstocks. A lower yield was measured for CS grafted onto Nemadex AB due to the lower number of bunches and the lower weight of berries. The differences between the other three rootstocks are small, but CS grafted onto 420A MGt was the most productive. The CS grafted onto Nemadex AB had the lowest pruning weight while 101-14 MGt had the highest. In 2020, δ13C showed a more moderate water stress with 101-14 MGt and 420A MGt than with Nemadex AB. Surprisingly, the Gravesac was under more stress than the 101-14 MGt. The nitrogen status in the berries was better for Nemadex AB but this was perhaps due to the significantly lower weight of the berries.Rootstock 101-14 MGt attained the highest accumulation of sugars in the berries while 420A MGt allows to preserve higher acidity. The parcel is still young which may explain some of the results. These measures must therefore be continued over the next several years to fully assess the effects of these rootstocks on the development of the vines and the quality of the production under new climatic conditions.