terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 PHENOLICS DYNAMICS OF BERRIES FROM VITIS VINIFERA CV SYRAH GRAFTED ON TWO CONTRASTING ROOTSTOCKS UNDER COMBINED SALINITY AND WATER STRESSORS AND ITS EFFECT ON WINE QUALITY

PHENOLICS DYNAMICS OF BERRIES FROM VITIS VINIFERA CV SYRAH GRAFTED ON TWO CONTRASTING ROOTSTOCKS UNDER COMBINED SALINITY AND WATER STRESSORS AND ITS EFFECT ON WINE QUALITY

Abstract

Wine regions are getting warmer as average temperatures continue raising affecting grape growth, berry composition and wine production. Berry quality was evaluated in plants of Vitis vinifera cv Syrah grafted on two rootstocks, Paulsen (PL1103) and SO4, and grown under two salinity concentrations (LS:0.7dS/m and HS:2.5dSm-1) in combination with two irrigation regimes (HW:133% and CW:100%), being the seasonal water application 483mm (control, 100%). Spectrophotometer measurements from berry skin during veraison and harvest stages and from “young” wine samples, were indicative of the stressors effect and the mediation of the rootstocks. At veraison (i) total phenolics content were high under LSHW (0.7dSm-1 and high water conditions) for SO4 and PL1103. (ii) Tannins were higher in SO4 under LSHW and in PL1103 under HSCW (2.5dSm-1 and control water conditions). (iii) Higher carotenoids were found at HSCW for both rootstocks. At harvest: (i) total phenolics content decreased dramatically from veraison to harvest stage under high salinity in both rootstocks. Phenolic content decreased by 34% in SO4 and 32% in PL1103. Under LS (0.7dSm-1) total phenolics content decreased by 29% in both rootstocks. (ii) Tannins in SO4 were higher under LSCW (0.7dSm-1 and control water conditions) while in PL1103 were higher under HSHW (2.5dSm-1 and high water conditions). (iii) Carotenoids highly accumulated under HSHW in both rootstocks. In young wine samples: (i) total phenolics content was higher in wines made from berries under HSCW in SO4 while in PL1103 was higher under LSCW treatment. (ii) Tannin content was higher in the wine made from berries under HSHW from SO4 and with berries from PL1103 grafts under LSCW. (iii) For carotenoids the highest content was found in wines made with SO4 under LSCW and with PL1103under HSCW. In conclusion, our results show a clear mediating effect of the rootstock on Syrah berry metabolism and wine quality. This data should be considered when planning the use of reclaimed water in irrigation strategies or when growing plants in saline soils. Moreover, graft tolerance and mediating effects on berry metabolism might not be consistent, requiring a compromise between yield and quality.

 

1. Han X, Wang Y, Lu HC, Yang HY, Li HQ, Gao XT, Pei XX, He F, Duan CQ, Wang J. The combined influence of rootstock and vintage climate on the grape and wine flavonoids of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon in eastern China. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 16;13:978497. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.978497. PMID: 36051296; PMCID: PMC9424884.
2. Nikolaou, K.-E.;Chatzistathis, T.; Theocharis, S.;Argiriou, A.; Koundouras, S.;Zioziou, E. Effects of Salinity and Rootstock on Nutrient Element Concentrations and Physiology in Own–Rooted or Grafted to 1103 P and 101-14 Mgt Rootstocks of Merlot and Cabernet Franc Grapevine Cultivars under Climate Change.Sustainability 2021, 13, 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052477
3. Pou, A., Balda, P., Cifre, J., Ochogavia, J. M., Ayestaran, B., Guadalupe, Z., Llompart, M., Bota, J., & Martínez, L. . (2023). Influence of non-irrigation and seasonality on wine colour, phenolic composition and sensory quality of a grapevine (Vitis vinifera Callet) in a Mediterranean climate. OENO One, 57(1), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.7199
4. Teixeira A, Eiras-Dias J, Castellarin SD, Gerós H. Berry phenolics of grapevine under challenging environments. Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Sep 11;14(9):18711-39. doi: 10.3390/ijms140918711. PMID: 24030720; PMCID: PMC3794804.
5. Van Leeuwen, C., & Darriet, P. (2016). The Impact of Climate Change on Viticulture and Wine Quality. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(1), 150-167. doi:10.1017/jwe.2015.21

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Tania Acuña¹ Kidanemaryam Reta² Yaniv Lupo²; Noga Sikron¹; Shimon Rachmilevitch³; Naftali Lazarovitch³; Aaron Fait¹

1. Albert Katz Department of Dryland Biotechnologies, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Dry-lands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sde-Boker Campus, 849900 Israel
2. Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sde-Boker Campus, 849900 Israel
3. Wyler Department for Dryland Agriculture, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sde-Boker Campus, 849900 Israel.

Contact the author*

Keywords

phenolics, rootstocks, combined stress, wineberry quality

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

WHITE WINES OXIDATIVE STABILITY: A 2-VINTAGE STUDY OF CHARDONNAY CHAMPAGNE BASE WINES AGED ON LEES IN BARRELS

Ultra-premium champagne wines are characterized by a long stay on laths. The goal of the winemaker is to use all possible oenological techniques to keep the aromatic freshness of the future products. To that purpose, some champagne base wines can be aged on lees in oak barrels. However, if it is now acknowledged that such ageing practices contribute to the oxidative stability of dry white wines, no study has been done on Chardonnay champagne base wines designed for a long ageing on laths [1].

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).

ACIDIC AND DEMALIC SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS FOR MANAGING PROBLEMS OF ACIDITY DURING THE ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION

In a recent study several genes controlling the acidification properties of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been identified by a QTL approach [1]. Many of these genes showed allelic variations that affect the metabolism of malic acid and the pH homeostasis during the alcoholic fermentation. Such alleles have been used for driving genetic selection of new S. cerevisiae starters that may conversely acidify or deacidify the wine by producing or consuming large amount of malic acid [2]. This particular feature drastically modulates the final pH of wine with difference of 0.5 units between the two groups.

IMPACT OF MINERAL AND ORGANIC NITROGEN ADDITION ON ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION WITH S. CEREVISIAE

During alcoholic fermentation, nitrogen is one of essential nutrient for yeast as it plays a key role in sugar transport and biosynthesis of and wine aromatic compounds (thiols, esters, higher alcohols). The main issue of a lack in yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) in winemaking is sluggish or stuck fermentations promoting the growth of alteration species and leads to economic losses. Currently, grape musts are often characterized by low YAN concentration and an increase of sugars concentration due to global warming, making alcoholic fermentations even more difficult. YAN depletion can be corrected by addition of inorganic (ammonia) or organic (yeast derivatives products) nitrogen during alcoholic fermentation.

BIOPROTECTION BY ADDING NON-SACCHAROMYCES YEASTS : ADVANCED RESEARCH ON THIS PROMISING ALTERNATIVE TO SO₂

Sulphur dioxide has been used for many years for its antimicrobial, antioxidant and antioxydasic properties in winemaking but nowadays, it is a source of controversy. Indeed, consumers are more attentive to the naturalness of their foods and beverages and the legislation is changing to reduce the total SO₂ levels allowed in wines. To limit and replace the doses of sulphur dioxide applied, winemakers can now use bioprotection consisting in live yeast addition as alternative,seems to be promising. This process, lightly used in from the food industry, allows to colonize the environment and limit the development or even eliminate undesirable microorganisms without altering the sensory properties of the product.