Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Update knowledge about the presence of condensed tannins in grapes and their contributions to astringency perception

Update knowledge about the presence of condensed tannins in grapes and their contributions to astringency perception

Abstract

Condensed tannin is a principle group of polyphenol compounds derived from grape, greatly contributing to the bioactivity and the sensory perception of wine. Condensed tannins present as a heterogeneous mixture in nature involving various degrees of both polymerization and galloylation. Even though multiple attempts focusing on fractionation of grape condensed tannins by solid-phase have been conducted over the past decades, few individual tannins have been purified and identified. Hence, our knowledge on grape and wine condensed tannin moleculars has to be limited at the several known monomeric, dimeric and trimeric proanthocyanidins. In the present study, a rapid and effective approach was developed to isolate the galloylated proanthocyanidin from the non-galloylated forms in grape seed tannins and fractionate the non-galloylated proanthocyanidin according to their degree of polymerization by the technique of Centrifugal partition chromatography (CPC). The application of CPC on grape tannins fractionation is efficient, less-time consuming, less expensive and with higher recovery. More importantly, it could effectively isolate galloylated tannins at the beginning and eliminate its interference in the other fractions. After fractionation performed by the technique of CPC, the repurification was achieved by either preparative hydrophilic interaction chromatography or reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Eventually, a series of individual condensed tannins with certain degree of polymerization and galloylation from grape were isolated successively. Analyte identity and purity were examined by reversed-phase UPLC-DAD-ESI-Q-TOF and normal-phase HPLC-UV-Fluo-MS, respectively. The astringency perception contributions of the purified individual tannins were examined by the approach of salivary binding ability test. The results were observed by HPLC-Fluo and quantified by the difference of the amount of proanthocyanidins between before and after interaction.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Wen Ma*, Hua Li, Michael Jourdes, Pierre Waffo-Téguo, Pierre-Louis Teissedre

*ISVV

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

This study investigates how the sensory profile of Pinot Blanc is affected from different maceration and pressing techniques. Grapes were sourced from four vineyards in the village Tramin in South Tyrol. For the experiment 200 kg of grapes from each vineyard site were hand picked the day before harvest for the commercial winery took place. Grapes were stored over night at 4°C, homogenized and processed in the experimental winery at Laimburg research centre the day after harvest. Four different pressing techniques were applied in duplicates of 100kg each.

Effect of nanofiltration on the chemical composition and wine quality

In Enology the conventional processes of filtration for clarification and stabilization are giving place to alternative membrane processes, including nanofiltration (NF). Furthermore, the increased alcohol content in wines recorded in recent years became an important issue for all the main wine producing countries. Among techniques available to the wine industry to reduce the ethanol content, NF is certainly one of the newest. This study is focused on the evaluation of NF influence on wine physical-chemical composition, including mineral content, which in accordance to our best knowledge is a novelty.

Extraction of pathogenesis-related proteins and phenolics in Sauvignon Blanc as affected by different

The composition of wine is largely determined by the composition of pre-fermentation juice, which is influenced by extraction of grape components. Different grape harvesting and processing conditions could affect the extraction of grape components into juice. Among these grape components, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins are of great concern for white wine maker as they are the main cause of haze formation in finished white wine. If not removed before bottling, these PR proteins may progress into haze through the formation of complex with phenolics under certain conditions. Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) and chitinases are the main constituents of PR proteins found in protein haze.

Accumulation of polyphenols in Barbera and Nebbiolo leaves during the vegetative season

Grapevine berries produce thousands of secondary metabolites of diverse chemical nature that have been largely detailed in the past due to their importance for defining wine quality. The wide Vitis vinifera diversity, resulting in thousands of different varieties well detailed in many studies regarding berries, is still not investigated in vegetative organs, leaves in particular. Deepening knowledge related to this aspect could be of great interest for many reasons (for example the possibility of using leaf extract for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and nutrition purposes) but, above all, for understanding the susceptibility of different grapevine varieties to pathogens.

Impact of drought stress on concentration and composition of wine proteins in Riesling

Protein haze in white wines is a major technological and economic problem of the wine industry. Field tests were carried out in steep slope vineyards planted with Riesling grapes over 3 dry growing seasons to study the effect of drought stress on the concentration of proteins in the resulting wines. Plots suffering from drought stress were compared with surrounding drip irrigated plots. Riesling grapes were processed into wines by conventional procedures. Protein amounts of the isolated wine colloids of the stressed samples were always higher than those of the watered samples(mean watered 13.8 ± 0.44, mean stressed 17.4 ± 0.40 g 100 g-1). As a consequence, higher bentonite doses were needed to achieve protein haze stability of the drought stressed treatments.