terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Leaf necrosis induced by the insecticide carbaryl in Vitis rupestris ‘B38’

Leaf necrosis induced by the insecticide carbaryl in Vitis rupestris ‘B38’

Abstract

Carbaryl is an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor-type insecticide used for pest control on grapevine. We repeatedly observed the occurrence of interveinal leaf necrosis following carbaryl spray application in a Vitis rupestris x Vitis riparia F1 hybrid progeny vineyard.  Spray applications induced necrosis in this progeny under both Missouri and New York field conditions an approximate one-to-one sensitive-to-insensitive segregation ratio and with 42% concordance. Results of subsequent in vitro experiments established causality between carbaryl treatment and leaf necrosis and confirmed the pattern of segregation observed in the field. We consistently map this phenotype to a major QTL on chromosome 16 of the female parent V. rupestris ‘B38’ regardless of whether we used field or in vitro-generated phenotype data. The PN40024 12x.v1 genome sequence under the QTL peak is a gene-rich region encoding several receptor-like kinases and nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors. RNA-seq and qPCR analyses of the carbaryl-induced transcriptome demonstrated the up-regulation of genes encoding the immune response regulator EDS1, pathogenesis-related proteins and stilbene synthases in sensitive, but not in insensitive progeny plants. While the development of leaf necrosis involved certain components of pathogen-triggered cell death regulatory pathway, other molecular events did not agree with the “misguided immune response” paradigm. An extensive screen of native North American grapevine accessions suggested that carbaryl sensitivity is rare in Vitis, and possibly unique to the V. rupestris ‘B38’ genotype, though members of Parthenocissus, another Vitaceae genus, are damaged by carbaryl.

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Poster

Authors

Laszlo Kovacs1*, Courteny Coleman1, Courtney Duncan1, Michael Bigelow1, Cody Pham1, Zachary Harris2, Jason Londo3

1 Department of Biology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO USA
2 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO USA
3 School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY USA

Contact the author*

Keywords

Insecticide damage, Vitis rupestris ‘B38’, leaf necrosis, immune response, quantitative trait locus

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

How different SO2 doses impact amino acid and volatile profile of white wines

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is a well-established preservative in the wine industry. Its ability to act in different stages of the process as an antioxidant and an antiseptic as main characteristics makes it versatile. However, the need for its reduction or even its replacement has been increasing by the regulatory authorities as well as by the final consumer. To understand the impact of SO2 during ageing on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and amino acids (AAs) profiles, two white wines (one varietal and one blend) were aged under the same conditions, in the presence of different doses of SO2. After fermentation (t=0), 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 mg/L of SO2 were applied, wines were kept over lees for 3 months (t=3), then were bottled after 3 (t=6) and 9 (t=12) months.

Study of the grape glycosidic aroma precursors by crossing SPE-GC/MS, SPME-GC/MS and LC/QTOF methods

Depending on the variety, grapes contain several chemical classes of aromatic compounds (i.e., terpenols, norisoprenoids, benzenoids) mainly stored as glycosides in berry skin.

Digital PCR: a tool for the early detection of brettanomyces in wine

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is found in various ecological niches, but particularly in fermentative processes: beer, kombucha, cider and wine. In the oenological sector, this yeast is undesirable, as it can produce ethyl phenols, thus altering wine quality. These compounds are characterized by stable or horse-sweat aromas, unpleasant for consumers.

Research on the origin and the side effects of chitosan stabilizing properties in wine

Fungal chitosan is a polysaccharide made up of glucosamine and N-acetyl-glucosamine and derived from chitin-glucan of Aspergillus niger or Agaricus bisporus. Fungal chitosan has been authorized as an antiseptic agent in wine since 2009 (OIV) and in organic wine in 2018. At the maximum dose of 10g/hl, it was shown to eliminate Brettanomyces bruxellensis, the main spoilage agent in red wines. Fungal chitosan is highly renewable, biocompatible (ADI equivalent to sucrose) and non-allergenic. However, winemakers often prefer to use sulfites (SO2), though sulfites are classified as priority food allergens, than chitosan. Indeed, many conflicting reports exist regarding its efficiency and its side effects towards beneficial wine microorganisms or wine taste. These contradictions could be explained by the heterogeneity of the fungal chitosan lots traded, the diversity of the wines (chemical composition, winemaking process), but also, by the recently highlighted huge genetic diversity prevailing in wine microbial species.

Monitoring of Pesticide Residues from Vine to Wine

Those previous years, pesticides are often brought to the forefront by media. Questions arose about their toxicity for growers and consumers. Even if a downward trend is underway, the use of pesticides is required to ensure steady quality and quantity of harvests. A large number of active ingredients are authorized but regarding viticulture, mainly insecticides and fungicides are applied, to control pests and diseases and to increase crop yield. Some phytosanitary products, principally fungicides, applied close to the harvest date may frequently be detected in wines.