Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2021 9 Grapevine diversity and viticultural practices for sustainable grape growing 9 Exploring the effect of ripening rates on the composition of aroma and phenolic compounds in Cabernet-Sauvignon wines

Exploring the effect of ripening rates on the composition of aroma and phenolic compounds in Cabernet-Sauvignon wines

Abstract

AIM: The study of cultural practices to delay ripening and the characterization of their effect on wine composition is important in the mitigation of accelerated ripening caused by higher temperatures and frequent water stress events. The desynchronization between sugar accumulation and anthocyanins and organic acids during advanced ripening reported in previous studies frequently results in sub-optimal phenolic and aromatic maturity at the targeted sugar levels for winemaking. In this study, the effect of different rates of ripening on the chemistry of Cabernet Sauvignon wines was studied to explore if delayed ripening would result in higher quality wines.

METHODS: Fruit sugar accumulation rates were manipulated by means of crop load manipulation treatments and late season irrigation. Fruit was harvested at 26 °Brix and submitted to small-lot research winemaking. The basic chemistry and the composition of phenolic and aroma compounds were analyzed in the final wines.

RESULTS: The vineyard treatments returned three kinetics of sugar accumulation. A faster sugar accumulation (1 week earlier) was obtained by reducing crop load while a combination of crop removal and late season irrigation delayed ripening (2 weeks later) compared to untreated vines. Such effects of crop load and late season irrigation were already reported previously. In the final wines, there were little or no changes in the basic chemistry in response to the ripening rate. Crop load affected mainly the profile of wine aroma compounds, including both grape-derived and fermentation-derived compounds. On the other hand, an increase of irrigation late in the season led to an increase in phenolic compound levels, resulting in improved color and mouthfeel characteristics. Ripening was delayed by the interaction of cluster thinning and late season irrigation, which in turn led to higher concentrations of both volatile and phenolic compounds and further improvement of wine quality. In response to a slower sugar accumulation, an improvement of primary quality indicators of grape quality, such as lower green compounds and higher anthocyanins, translated into higher wine quality. Similar effects on these wine components were already observed in studies in which ripening was delayed by other means.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further confirmation that delayed ripening is beneficial to improve wine quality in late-ripening varieties. Amelioration of accelerated ripening is especially critical in warm and dry viticulture regions with long seasons, while the treatments investigated may not be necessary nor result in the same outcomes in cool wine regions. It was also shown that crop load and late season irrigation have a specific effect on aroma and phenolic compounds respectively, which deserves to be further explored in future studies.

DOI:

Publication date: September 2, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Pietro Previtali

The University of Adelaide and Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production,Nick DOKOOZLIAN, E. & J. Gallo Winery and Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production Luis SANCHEZ, E. & J. Gallo Winery Bruce PAN, E. & J. Gallo Winery Kerry WILKINSON, The University of Adelaide and Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production Christopher FORD, The University of Adelaide and Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production

Contact the author

Keywords

aroma compounds; delayed ripening; phenolic compounds; ripening rates; wine metabolites

Citation

Related articles…

Local adaptation tools to ensure the viticultural sustainability in a changing climate

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Adaptation to soil and climate through the choice of plant material

Choosing the rootstock, the scion variety and the training system best suited to the local soil and climate are the key elements for an economically sustainable production of wine. The choice of the rootstock/scion variety best adapted to the characteristics of the soil is essential but, by changing climatic conditions, ongoing climate change disrupts the fine-tuned local equilibrium. Higher temperatures induce shifts in developmental stages, with on the one hand increasing fears of spring frost damages and, on the other hand, ripening during the warmest periods in summer. Expected higher water demand and longer and more frequent drought events are also major concerns. The genetic control of the phenotypes, by genomic information but also by the epigenetic control of gene expression, offers a lot of opportunities for adapting the plant material to the future. For complex traits, genomic selection is also a promising method for predicting phenotypes. However, ecophysiological modelling is necessary to better anticipate the phenotypes in unexplored climatic conditions Genetic approaches applied on parameters of ecophysiological models rather than raw observed data are more than ever the basis for finding, or building, the ideal varieties of the future.

Late season canopy management practices to reduce sugar loading and improve color profile of Cabernet-Sauvignon grapes and wines in the high irradiance and hot conditions of California Central Valley

Global warming is accelerating grape ripening, leading to unbalanced wines from fruit with high sugar content but poor aroma and colour development. Reducing the size of the photosynthetic apparatus after veraison has been shown to delay technological ripeness in cool climates, but methods have not been tested in areas with high irradiance and temperature where fruit exposure could have disastrous effects on berry composition. In this Cabernet-Sauvignon trial, we compared the application of an antitranspirant (pinolene), to severe canopy topping and above bunch zone leaf removal, all performed at mid-ripening, with an untouched control. We monitored the vines weekly by measuring stem water potential, gas exchange, fruit zone light exposure. We sampled berries to measure berry weight, total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, and the anthocyanin profile. At harvest, we assessed yield components, measured carbon isotope discrimination, rated sunburn on clusters, and produced experimental wines. We submitted harvest samples to metabolomic profiling through PFP-Q Exactive MS/MS and wines to sensory analysis. Application of the antitranspirant significantly reduced stomatal conductance and assimilation rate but did not affect the stem water potential. Inversely, leaf removal and topping increased water potential but did not affect leaf gas exchange. The late topping was the only treatment able to decrease sugar content (up to 2Bx), increase titratable acidity and pH, and improve anthocyanin content because of lower degradation of di-hydroxylated forms. Late leaf removal above the bunch zone increased lightning conditions in the canopy and produced the most significant damage on fruits. Yield components were not affected. This work suggests that late-season canopy management can effectively control ripening speeds and improve grapes and wines. Still, the effect on grape exposure in a critical time must be well balanced to avoid problems with the appropriate technique.

Late frost protection in Champagne

Probably one of the most counterintuitive impacts of climate change on vine is the increased frequency of late frost. Champagne, due to its septentrional position is historically and regularly affected by this meteorological hazard. Champagne has therefore developed a strong experience in frost protection with first experiments dating from the end of 19th century. Frost protection can be divided in two parts: passive and active. Passive protection includes all the methods that do not seek to modify the vine’s environment or resistance at the time of frost. The most iconic passive protection in Champagne is the establishment of the individual reserve. This reserve allows to stock a certain quantity of clear wine during a surplus year to compensate a meteorological hazard like frost during the following years. Other common passive methods are the control of planting area (walls, bushes, topography), the choice of grape variety, late pruning, or the impact of grass cover and tillage. Active frost protection is also divided in two parts. Most of the existing techniques tend to modify vine’s environment. Most of the time they provide warmth (candles, heaters, windmills, heating cables…), or stabilise bud’s temperature above a lethal threshold (water sprinkling). The other way to actively fight is to enhance the resistance of buds to frost (elicitors). The Comité Champagne evaluates frost protection methods following three main axes: the efficiency, the profitability, and the environmental impact through a lifecycle assessment. This study will present the results on both passive and active protection following these three axes.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.