Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Terroir Conferences 9 Terroir 2010 9 Geology and Soil: effects on wine quality (T2010) 9 Influence of soil characteristics on vine growth, plant nutrient levels and juice properties: a multi-year analysis

Influence of soil characteristics on vine growth, plant nutrient levels and juice properties: a multi-year analysis

Abstract

Soil physical and chemical properties affect vine nutrition, as indicated by leaf and petiole nutrient content, in a way that may directly impact wine properties. The goal of this multi-year project is to study the relationship between vineyard soils and the wines produced on them using a variety of biogeochemical and mineral analyses, coupled with an analysis of vine properties and juice characteristics. This study examines leaf and petiole nutrient levels, as well as fruit and juice characteristics, of own-rooted Cabernet Sauvignon vines grown on four distinct soil types in the same Paso Robles vineyard. The soils were classified as Palexeralfs, Haploxeralfs, Haploxerolls and Haploxererts. The four soils exhibited important morphological differences in color, coarse fragment content, texture, water holding capacity, and hydraulic conductivity. The soils also showed important differences in chemical characteristics and nutrient availability. The soils covered contiguous vineyard patches planted with the same cultivar, on its own roots. The vineyard was irrigated and fertilized. Mesoclimatic conditions and slope aspect were similar. Soils were analyzed for physical and chemical differences to determine the influence of the four contrasting soil types on differences in vine growth, water stress and plant nutrient levels. Differences in cation exchange capacity and cationic balance in the soil solution appeared to affect nutrient availability to the vines, and likely contributed to the observed differences in the plant and fruit characteristics. Berries harvested on the four blocks exhibited different sensory attributes, as determined by a tasting panel. In an analysis of data from three consecutive growing seasons, many of the observed differences in plant vigor between vineyard blocks were consistent from year to year, as were differences in fruit yield and juice properties. Taken together, these findings support a role for soil texture, water and nutrient availability on vine and fruit parameters, and emphasize that differences in soil properties within a single vineyard may require site-specific management practices.

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

J.-J. Lambert (1), J. Fujita (1), C. Gruenwald (1), R.A. Dahlgren (2), H. Heymann (1), J.A. Wolpert (1,3)

(1) Department of Viticulture and Enology
(2) Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, UC Davis
(3) UC Cooperative Extension, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis CA 95616 USA

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil, Biogeochemistry, Nutrients, Leaf, Petiole, Management

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Legal and economic evolution of the Japanese wine industry in the 21st century

Historically bounded by strict regulations with a focus on taxation since the 19th century, the japanese wine industry stands at a crossroads in the 21st century, necessitated by alignment with international standards and opening towards global markets.

Impact and comprehension of nitrogen and lipid nutrition on the production of fermentative aromas with different S. Cerevisiae yeasts used for spirits

In the Cognac appellation, the production of white wines is almost exclusively dedicated to elaborate Charentaise eaux-de-vie. In this sense, the quality of Cognac eaux-de-vie intrinsically depends on the quality of the base wines subjected to the distillation stage. In this context, the production of these base wines differs from those of classic white wines to release particular organoleptic properties during the distillation stage.

Composition and molar mass distribution of different must and wine colloids

A major problem for winemakers is the formation of proteinaceous haze after bottling. Although the exact mechanisms remain unclear, this haze is formed by unfolding and agglomeration of grape proteins, being additionally influenced by numerous further factors.

Comparing the chemical and sensory consequences of grapevine smoke exposure in grapes and wine from different cultivars and different wine regions in Australia

Aim: This study aimed to benchmark the chemical and sensory consequences of grapevine exposure to smoke, by comparing: (i) the concentration of volatile phenols and volatile phenol glycosides in control and smoke-affected grapes from different cultivars and different wine regions; and (ii) the chemical and sensory profiles of wines made from control and smoke-affected grapes, from different cultivars.  

Differences in the chemical composition and “fruity” aromas of Auxerrois sparkling wines from the use of cane and beet sugar during wine production.

The main objective of this study was to establish if beet sugar produces a different concentration of “fruity” volatile aroma compounds (VOCs), compared to cane sugar when used for second alcoholic fermentation of Auxerrois sparkling wines. Auxerrois base wine from the 2020 vintage was separated into two lots; half was fermented with cane sugar and half with beet sugar (both sucrose products and tested for sugar purity). These sugars were used in yeast acclimation (IOC 2007), and base wines for the second fermentation (12 bottles each). Base wines were manually bottled at the Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute (CCOVI) research winery. The standard chemical analysis took place at intervals of 0, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post-bottling. Acidity and pH measurements were carried out by an auto-titrator. Residual Sugar (g/L) (glucose (g/L), fructose (g/L)), YAN (mg N/L), malic acid, and acetic acid (g/L) were analyzed by Megazyme assay kits. parameters were analyzed by Megazyme assay kits. Alcohol (% v/v) was assessed by GC-FID. VOC analysis of base wines, finished sparkling wines, as well as the two sugars in model sparkling wine solutions, was carried out by GC-MS. VOCs included ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl decanoate, ethyl-2-methylbutyrate, ethyl-3-methylbutyrate, ethyl 2-methyl propanoate, ethyl 2- hydroxy propanoate, 1-hexanol, 2-phenylethan-1-ol, ethyl acetate, hexyl acetate, isoamyl acetate and 2-phenylethyl acetate.