WAC 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 WAC 9 WAC 2022 9 1 - WAC - Posters 9 Aroma chemical markers of Durello wines from different vintages and origins: a case study

Aroma chemical markers of Durello wines from different vintages and origins: a case study

Abstract

Wines expressing sensory characters that are representative of their varietal and geographical origins are highly sought after in today’s market. It is therefore of considerable technological interest to investigate the aromatic aspects of specific wines and to identify the odorous substances involved. This study investigated aroma chemical and sensory diversity of Durello DOC white sparkling wines. The production of this white wine, based on the use of Vitis vinifera Durella grapes, is located in the hilly area of the eastern Lessini mountains straddling the border between the provinces of Verona and Vicenza. A peculiarity of this denomination is the subdivision of the production area into a further fifteen sub-regions. The aim of this study was the aromatic characterisation of Durello wines. Particular attention was paid to the impact of ageing/vintage and the sub-region of origin of the grapes.

For this study, a sampling of twenty-one commercial Durello provided by the Durello wine consortium was considered. These wines belonged to four different vintages (2016-2019) and seven sub-zones. Free volatile compounds as well as those obtained from the hydrolysis of  glycosidic precursors were quantified with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis coupled with SPE and SPME extractions. Sensory evaluation of wines was carried out through sorting task performed with semi-trained panel. Wines differed significantly in their aroma chemical composition,  , in particular due to vintage/ageing and sub-zones impact. The effect of ageing was appreciable and involved different biochemical classes of compounds: esters, terpenes, norisoprenoids and methyl salicylate. With ageing, a decrease in acetic esters, some ethyl esters, free and bound terpenes and a simultaneous increase in norisoprenoids, some cyclic terpenes and methyl salicylate were found. Differences attributable to the sub-regions were mainly due to terpenes and norisoprenoids but also benzenoids, fatty acids and some sulphur compounds. The sorting task identified two clusters, the main variable associated to sensory differences was vintage/aging but further elements related to production style were identified. 1,4-Cineole was identified as an aromatic marker of Durello sparkling wine.

DOI:

Publication date: June 27, 2022

Issue: WAC 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Giovanni Luzzini, Daniele, Facinelli, Davide, Slaghenaufi, Maurizio, Ugliano 

Presenting author

Giovanni Luzzini – Università di Verona

Università di Verona | Università di Verona | Università di Verona

Contact the author

Keywords

Durello – White sparkling wines aroma – Cineoles – Additional geographical mentions – wine aging

Tags

IVES Conference Series | WAC 2022

Citation

Related articles…

NMR approach for monitoring the photo-degradation of riboflavin and methionine

The light exposure of white wine is responsible for several reactions leading to changes on colour, flavours and, consequently, affecting the sensory profile.

Zonage vitivinicole: recherches et considérations initiales sur une proposition de “nouvelle” méthodologie d'”évaluation de la qualité” du produit tel qu’élément base pour le zonage aussi

Si on part de l’introduction que l’activité vitivinicole maintenant plus que jamais doit être une activité d’entreprenariat introduite de mieux en mieux sur le territoire et donc effectuée pour rendre maximal le Profit

Teasing apart terroir: the influence of management style on native yeast communities within Oregon wineries and vineyards

Newer sequencing technologies have allowed for the addition of microbes to the story of terroir. The same environmental factors that influence the phenotypic expression of a crop also shape the composition of the microbial communities found on that crop. For fermented goods, such as wine, that microbial community ultimately influences the organoleptic properties of the final product that is delivered to customers. Recent studies have begun to study the biogeography of wine-associated microbes within different growing regions, finding that communities are distinct across landscapes. Despite this new knowledge, there are still many questions about what factors drive these differences. Our goal was to quantify differences in yeast communities due to management style between seven pairs of conventional and biodynamic vineyards (14 in total) throughout Oregon, USA. We wanted to answer the following questions: 1) are yeast communities distinct between biodynamic vineyards and conventional vineyards? 2) are these differences consistent across a large geographic region? 3) can differences in yeast communities be tied to differences in metabolite profiles of the bottled wine? To collect our data we took soil, bark, leaf, and grape samples from within each vineyard from five different vines of pinot noir. We also collected must and a 10º brix sample from each winery. Using these samples, we performed 18S amplicon sequencing to identify the yeast present. We then used metabolomics to characterize the organoleptic compounds present in the bottled wine from the blocks the year that we sampled. We are actively in the process of analysing our data from this study.

Using Landsat LST data to predict vineyard productivity anomalies: A case study in the Euganean Hills wine region, Italy

In the current scenario of climatic variability, even though the vine (Vitis vinifera) is a species generally considered very fertile, the process of bud differentiation is particularly influenced by the weather trend not only of the current year but also of the previous one.

EFFECT OF MANNOPROTEIN-RICH EXTRACTS FROM WINE LEES ON PHENOLICCOMPOSITION AND COLOUR OF RED WINE

In 2022, wine production was estimated at around 260 million hl. This high production rate implies to generate a large amount of by-products, which include grape pomace, grape stalks and wine lees. It is estimated that processing 100 tons of grapes leads to ~ 22 tons of by-products from which ~ 6 tons are lees [1]. Wine lees are a sludge-looking material mostly made of dead and living yeast cells, yeast debris and other particles that precipitate at the bottom of wine tanks after alcoholic fermentation. Unlike grape pomace or grape stalks, few strategies have been proposed for the recovery and valorisation of wine less [2].