Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2021 9 Grapevine diversity and viticultural practices for sustainable grape growing 9 Effect of late pruning on yield and wine composition in monastrell wines

Effect of late pruning on yield and wine composition in monastrell wines

Abstract

Global warming is shifting vine phenology, resulting in a decoupling of phenolic and technological berry ripening. This is altering the balance of fruit traits, which is key relevance to winegrowers, particularly in arid and semi-arid areas. Our aim was to test late pruning as an useful tool to delay grape ripening and to assess the effects of this technique on the yield and wine composition, looking mainly to reduce the wine alcoholic content without reducing phenolic composition of the wines. A trial was established in a commercial vineyard comparing, in 2020 season, two vine training system (double cordon and goblet), two moments of pruning:

(i) winter (Control) and

(ii) before the basal bud burst (BBCH 07)(late-pruning, LP) and two harvest dates (12°and 14°Baumé).

In 2019, only goblet and harvest at 14°Baumé was tested. In 2019, and although there was a sharp decrease in yield, the composition of wine improve significantly (total acidity, colour intensity, anthocyanin and tannin), therefore we conducted the experiment in 2020 and this year late pruning were tested in two training system (goblet and double cordon) and two moments of harvest (12°and 14°Baume). When grapes were harvested at 12°Baumé, yield was not affected in both training system and late pruning slightly reduced alcohol content and increase total acidity, colour intensity, anthocyanin and tannin in the wines from both vineyards. When harvest was done when grapes reached 14° Baumé, late pruning significantly reduced yield, there was no effect on alcohol content and total acidity but LP increased colour intensity and anthocyanins in the wines of both vineyards. The effect of late pruning on harvest date were negligible for both training system (goblet and double cordon). However, if we compared the chromatic composition of LPT 12º wines with control wines made with 14ºBaume grapes, we could observed that they were similar but alcohol was 20% lower in LP 12º wines. Therefore, late pruning could be an useful tool to improve phenolic composition of wines, allowing a reduction of their alcohol content. It is clear that delayed pruning is a simple and cost-effective technique that may allow the semi-arid regions winegrowers to adapt to global warming, harvesting the grapes with lower sugar content without harming the quality of the wines.

DOI:

Publication date: September 2, 2021

Issue: Macrowine 2021

Type: Article

Authors

Alejandro Martínez Moreno

University of Murcia,Pilar Martínez Pérez (University of Murcia) Ana Belén Bautista Ortín (University of Murcia) Encarna Gómez Plaza (University of Murcia)

Contact the author

Keywords

global warming, phenology, govelet, Vitis vinifera

Citation

Related articles…

The impact of vine nitrogen status on aroma potential expression in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc

In interaction with climate and genetic or human factors, the soil is a major component of the viticulture terroir. The mineral composition of the soil influences vine performance and wine sensory attributes. Among the elements that vines take from the soil, nitrogen is the one that has the strongest impact on vine physiology, vigor and grape composition. In addition to its major effect on primary metabolites in berries, nitrogen plays also a decisive role in the secondary metabolism, especially in the production of key compounds for berries quality, like volatile thiols, methoxypyrazines and glutathione (GSH).

OPTIMIZATION OF EXTRACTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN LC-HRMS METHOD TO QUANTIFY GLUTATHIONE IN WHITE WINE LEES AND YEAST DERIVATIVES

Glutathione is a natural tripeptide composed of l-glutamate, l-cysteine and glycine, found in various foods and beverages. In particular, glutathione can be found in its reduced (GSH) or oxidized form (GSSG) in must, wine or yeasts¹. Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of GSH in wine quality and aging potential². During winemaking, especially during aging on lees, GSH helps prevent the harmful effects of oxidation on the aroma of the wine³. Nevertheless, the amounts of GSH/GSSG present in wine lees are often unknown and the choice of operating conditions (quantity of lees and aging time) remains empirical.

Natural glycolipids for the control of spoilage organisms in red wine

A natural glycolipid mixture obtained from the edible mushroom dacryopinax spathularia (“glycolipids”) is known to be an effective and approved antimicrobial treatment in non-alcoholic beverages at concentrations ranging from 5 – 100 mg/l. It has found a place alongside DMDC for the provision of microbial stability in soft drinks. These properties make the natural and sustainably produced glycolipids a promising candidate for the supplementation or replacement of SO2 in different winemaking processes.

How much does the soil, climate and viticultural practices contribute to the variability of the terroir expression?

When considering the application of a systemic approach to assess the intrinsic complexity of agricultural production, the following question immediately arises

Energy optimization of the Charmat-Martinotti refermentation process

The european union has estimated that energy consumption for wine production is about 1,750 million kwh per year, of which 500 million kwh is attributable to italy. In recent years, Italy has emerged as the world’s leading wine producer with about 50 million hectoliters per year. About 20 percent (9.8 million hectoliters) of Italian wine is marketed after refermentation according to the Charmat-Martinotti method.