WAC 2022 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 WAC 9 WAC 2022 9 3 - WAC - Oral 9 Accurate Quantification of Quality Compounds and Varietal Classification from Grape Extracts using the Absorbance-Transmittance Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrix (A-TEEM) Method and Machine Learning

Accurate Quantification of Quality Compounds and Varietal Classification from Grape Extracts using the Absorbance-Transmittance Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrix (A-TEEM) Method and Machine Learning

Abstract

Rapid and accurate quantification of grape berry phenolics, anthocyanins and tannins, and identification of grape varieties are both important for effective quality control of harvesting and initial processing for wine making. Current reference technologies including High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) can be rate limiting and too complex and expensive for effective field operations. Secondary calibrated techniques including UV-VIS and Near and Mid Infrared spectroscopy are insensitive to specific quality compounds and unable to make accurate varietal assignments. In this paper we analyze robotically prepared grape extracts from several key varieties (n=Calibration/p=Prediction samples) including Cabernet sauvignon (64/10), Grenache (16/4), Malbec (14/4), Merlot (56/10), Petit syrah (52/10), Pinot noir (54/8), Syrah (20/2), Terlodego (14/2) and Zinfandel (62/12). Key phenolic and anthocyanin parameters measured by HPLC included Catechin, Epicatechin, Quercetin Glycosides, Malvidin 3-glucoside, Total Anthocyanins and Polymeric Tannins. Separate samples diluted 150 fold in 50% EtOH pH 2 were analyzed in parallel using the A-TEEM method following Multiblock Data Fusion of the absorbance and unfolded EEM data. A-TEEM chemical data were calibrated (n=390) using Extreme Gradient Boost (XGB) Regression and evaluated based on the Root Mean Square Error of the Prediction (RMSEP), the Relative Error of Prediction (REP%) and Coefficient of Variation (R2P) of the Prediction data (n=62). The regression results yielded an average REP% value of 6.0±2.4% and R2P of 0.941±0.024. While we consider the REP% values to be in the acceptable range at <10% we acknowledge that both the grape extraction method repeatability and HPLC reference method repeatability likely contributed the major sources of variation; e.g., A-TEEM sample REP%=1.31 for Polymeric Tannins. Varietal classification was analyzed using XGB discrimination analysis of the Multiblock data and evaluated based on the Prediction data. The classification results yielded 100% True Positive and True negative results for the Prediction Data for all varieties. We conclude that the A-TEEM method requires a minimum of sample preparation and rapid acquisition times (<1 min) and can serve as an accurate secondary method for both grape composition and varietal identification. Importantly, the application of the regression and classification models can be effectively automated for operators.

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2022

Issue: WAC 2022

Type: Article

Authors

Adam, Gilmore, Qiang, Sui

Presenting author

Adam, Gilmore – HORIBA Instruments Inc.

E & J Gallo Wines

Contact the author

Keywords

Extreme Gradient Boost – Phenolics – Anthocyanins- Tannins-Grape Variety

Tags

IVES Conference Series | WAC 2022

Citation

Related articles…

METAPIWI: unveiling the role of microbial communities in PIWI grapes for sustainable winemaking

The METAPIWI project advances viticulture research by examining microbial communities in PIWI (fungus-resistant) grapevines compared to traditional Vitis vinifera. It investigates how these microbes influence spontaneous fermentation and the production of distinct metabolites and aromas.

Brettanomyces bruxellensis, born to live

The wine spoilage yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis can be found at several steps in the winemaking process due to its resistance to multiple stress conditions. Among the resistance strategies, one could be the formation of biofilm, a lifestyle known to enhance persistence of microorganisms. In this study, we propose to characterize biofilm of B. bruxellensis in wine, especially through several microscopic analyses.

Distinctive flavour or taint? The case of smoky characters in wine

Forest fires in the vicinity of vineyards have significantly increased in the last decade and are a concern for grapegrowers and winemakers in many wine producing countries. The fires cause smoke drift throughout vineyards which cannot be avoided and may result in the production of wines described as ‘smoke tainted’. Such wines are characterized by undesirable sensory characters described as ‘smoky’, ‘burnt’, ‘ash’ aromas and flavours, and also may cause a lingering, unpleasant ashy aftertaste [1; 2].

Nitrogen uptake, translocation and YAN in berries upon water deficit in grapevines with contrasting stomatal sensitivity

Nitrogen (N2) is critical in grape berries, especially in organic wine making. After intake, N2 follows various metabolic and allocation routes and, from veraison, partly reallocates into berries. Water deficit affects the N2 nutrition due to a poor diffusion in soil solution and vascular mobilisation. Also, affects photosynthesis and the energy needed for metabolism, whose extent would depend on the stomatal sensitivity of the plant. We have assessed the effect of a moderate water deficit from pea size, in 3 years old field grown potted plants of Chardonnay (CH) and Cabernet Sauvignon (CS), differing in stomatal sensitivity, on the N2 status of plant parts. Water deficit reduced photosynthesis, leaf area and fresh and dry plant mass along the season, but up to a higher extent in CS.

Characterization of vineyard sites for quality wine production using meteorological, soil chemical and physical data

The quality of grapevines measured by yield and must density in the northern part of Europe -conditions can be characterized as a type of “cool climate” – vary strongly from year to year and from one production site to another, i.e. différences in must densities can range from 30 to 50 °Oe. An explanation may be changes of weather conditions during critical developmental stages of the grapevines (2, 3, 5). These can be categorized as “macro climatic” influences.