terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Acceptability of canned wines: effect of the level of involvement of consumers and type of wine

Acceptability of canned wines: effect of the level of involvement of consumers and type of wine

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing demand for alternative packaging designs in the food industry focused on diminishing the carbon footprint. Despite the environmental advantages of cans versus bottles, the traditional environment of wine has hindered the establishment of less contaminant containers. In this context, the objective of this study was to understand and generate knowledge about consumers´ perception of canned wines in comparison to bottled wines.

A total of 127 wine consumers from La Rioja and surroundings participated (traditional wine region). Each consumer evaluated the quality and liking of two young wines (white and red). Each wine was presented in duplicate, but with two different information: “wine in bottle” and “wine in can”. In addition, consumers described the samples using the RATA method. Finally, the involvement of the participants in wine was evaluated through 23 items in a Likert scale. [1]

Four groups of consumers with low (n=16), low-intermediate (n=35), intermediate-high (n=50) and high (n=26) levels of involvement were identified. A two-way ANOVA was calculated for each type of wine (white or red) with level of involvement of the judges and packaging as fixed factors. Consumers with the highest level of involvement perceived canned white wines as lower in quality, and they were less preferred, as they perceived them as more alcoholic and bitter than bottled wines. For red wines, the canned sample was perceived lower in quality, and less preferred than bottled wine regardless of the level of consumer involvement as the wine was perceived with higher notes of reduction (rotten eggs, rubbish) and undergrowth (mouldy).

In overall results show that average traditional wine consumer (except for highly involved) would accept white wines in cans, while they show lower tolerance to canned red wines in comparison to bottled wine.

References

1) Oyinseye P. et al. (2022) Multidimensional representation of wine drinking experience: Effects of the level of consumers’ expertise and involvement. Food Qual. Pref., 98: 104536.

DOI:

Publication date: October 13, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

C. Martínez Rodríguez1, M. González-Hernández1, C. Castillo Rio1*, P. Fernández-Zurbano1, D. Valentin2, M.  Sáenz-Navajas1

1Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (Universidad de La Rioja-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Gobierno de La Rioja). Departamento de Enología, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
2Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

cognitive, perception, alternative packaging, quality perception

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Evaluation of interception traps for capture of Xylotrechus arvicola (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in vineyards varieties from Protected Denomination of Origin León

Xylotrechus arvicola (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) is a pest in vineyards (Vitis vinifera) in the main Spain wine-producing regions with Protected Denomination of Origin (PDO). The action of the larvae, associated to the spreading of wood fungi, causes damage especially in important varieties of V. vinifera. X. arvicola females lay eggs concentrated in cracks or under the rhytidome in the wood vines, which allows the emerging larvae to get into the wood and make galleries inside the plant being then necessary to prune intensively or to pull up the bored plants (1). The objective of the study was to evaluate captures of X. arvicola insects in five varieties of V. vinifera in PDO León.

The influence of pre-heatwave leaf removal on leaf physiology and berry development

Due to climate change, the occurrence of heatwaves and drought events is increasing, with significant impact on viticulture. Common ways to adapt viticulture to a changing climate include site selection, genotype selection, irrigation management and canopy management. The latter mentioned being for instance source-sink manipulations, such as leaf removal, with the aim to delay ripening.

The tolerance of grapevine rootstocks to water deficit is related to root morphology and xylem anatomy traits 

Climate change is altering water balances, thereby compromising water availability for crops. In grapevine, the strategic selection of genotypes more tolerant to soil water deficit can improve the resilience of the vineyard under this scenario. Previous studies demonstrated that root anatomical and morphological traits determine vine performance under water deficit conditions. Therefore, 13 ungrafted rootstock genotypes, 6 commercial (420 A, 41 B, Evex 13-5, Fercal, 140 Ru y 110 R), and 7 from new breeding programs (RG2, RG3, RG4, RG7, RG8, RG9 and RM2) were evaluated in pots during 2021 and 2022.

Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH): a technique that allows the reduction of SO2 in winemaking

Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH) is an innovative, efficient and non-thermal technology that can be applied at different stages in winemaking in order to reduce or avoid the use of sulphites. During 2022 vintage, a batch of Xarel·lo must was processed by UHPH at 300 MPa with an inlet temperature (Ti) of 4 ºC. In order to verify the influence of the UHPH treatment in wine characteristics, alcoholic fermentations with this must (UHPH) were carried out and compared with a control batch (without SO2 addition (C)) and a sulphited batch, in which 60 mg/L of total SO2 (SO2) were added.

Analysis of the interaction of melatonin with glycolytic proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation 

Melatonin is a bioactive compound with antioxidant properties, that has been found in many fermented beverages, such as beer and wine [1]. Indeed, it has been shown that yeast can synthesize melatonin during alcoholic fermentation, although its role inside the cell, as well as the metabolic pathway involved in its synthesis, is still unclear [1]. Recent studies showed that during fermentation, melatonin interacts with different proteins of the glycolytic pathway in both Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeast, for instance glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase or enolase [2].