Enhancement of the terroir

Abstract

Le terroir est aujourd’hui le facteur de production et de valorisation le plus importante de la filière du vin. Dans un contexte où le défi commercial se déroule tout azimut, la distinction entre pays producteurs traditionnels et « nouveaux » n’est pas seulement une contre position géographique, culturelle et technique mais aussi, et surtout, juridique. En effet, le système des normes présentes dans le « vieux monde » (droits de plantations, décrets de productions, rendements à l’hectare, etc.) qui peut représenter, à court terme sur le marché global, des contraintes au développement et à l’innovation des produits, doit se transformer en opportunité. Mais les menaces deviennent des opportunités, si l’on travaille, de la vigne au marché, en passant par la communication, plutôt sur les éléments de différence que sur ceux d’affinité. Se donner le but d’être différents avant d’être meilleurs.

L’élément « unique » d’un vin, qui peut mettre en exergue les spécificités d’une région, d’une appellation, d’un lieu-dit, d’un site, d’une parcelle, est le terroir. Et l’outil, qui permet de valoriser un terroir est la connaissance, à la bonne échelle, des éléments structuraux, de fonctionnement et d’interaction qui le caractérisent. Mais font partie aussi du terroir d’autres facteurs d’ordre historique, culturel, social et économique qui se sont développés au cours du siècle et qui se sont mélangés et fondus avec la composante géographique du terroir. On pourrait donc, dans l’optique d’une valorisation à 360° d’un vin et de son alentour, concevoir l’esprit géo humain du terroir. Mais pour concevoir cet esprit, il est nécessaire que les acteurs de la filière vin soient capables de réfléchir, au-delà des vignes et des produits, dans une dimension systémique. Les travaux de zonage, qu’à partir des années 80, ont étudié et caractérisé les aires de production, les appellations d’origine et leurs terroirs, ont fort aidé à mettre en exergue les spécificités, à révéler les potentiels qualitatifs, à donner des explications et à mettre au point des outils de valorisation. Il suffit de reprendre les actes des colloques qui ont précédé celui auquel nous sommes en train de participer ainsi que les actes d’autres colloques concernant les paysage viticoles, d’analyser la démarche de l’UNESCO qui a créé un groupe de réflexion « terroirs et cultures » (au pluriel), pour comprendre l’évolution, la perception et l’importance du lien vin-terroir au cours de trois dernières décennies. La lecture et l’analyse des témoignages exposés dans les colloques cités permettent de mieux comprendre le travail qui a été réalisé, mais surtout le travail qui reste à accomplir pour valoriser les terroirs étudiés à travers les informations et les connaissances disponibles.

Aucun produit issu de la terre et du savoir-faire humain a fait l’objet d’autant d’études scientifiques multidisciplinaires et a stimulé des réflexions littéraires et artistiques comme le vin. Une telle richesse bibliographique représente du matériel qu’il faut analyser, adapter et synthétiser pour la valorisation des terroirs à vin. Les spécialistes de marketing ont toujours simplifié la distinction des producteurs de vins en deux catégories:
– Ceux orientés au produit,
– Ceux orientés au marché.
Dans le premier cas, on travaille pour créer des marchés aux vins existants (traditionnels), tandis que dans le deuxième cas, on vise à produire des vins en fonction des exigences des marchés réels ou potentiels. Selon une optique plus moderne, dynamique et évoluée, il serait bien de s’orienter de plus en plus vers le terroir soit pour réaliser des vins spécifiques, soit pour les valoriser sur des marchés de plus en plus exigeants. Les informations disponibles sur le terroir, son environnement géographique et socio-économique, sont des outils à utiliser afin de cibler la caractérisation et de mettre au point les stratégies et les actions, d’individualiser les éléments de valorisation et de protection du « système terroir » et de stimuler les axes d’innovation dans plusieurs aires d’application. Pour résumer les quelques opportunités de valorisation d’un terroir viticole et des paysages associées, on a proposé une matrice permettant de souligner le fort potentiel disponible. Au cours de l’intervention, on analysera, dans les détails, les croisements les plus importants entre les outils et les aires d’application : par exemple l’emploi des résultats d’un zonage pour caractériser le(s) paysage(s), ou pour mettre au point des stratégies de communication.

DOI:

Publication date: December 22, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2006

Type: Article

Authors

Mario FALCETTI

Secrétaire du groupe d’experts « Zonage vitivinicole » OIV, Paris
Directeur Contadi Castaldi, Franciacorta, Italie
Via Colzano, 32, 25030 Adro, Brescia, Italie

Contact the author

Keywords

terroir, valorisation, marché

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2006

Citation

Related articles…

How does aromatic composition of red wines, resulting from varieties adapted to climate change, modulate fruity aroma?

One of the major issues for the wine sector is the impact of climate change linked to the increasing temperatures which affects physicochemical parameters of the grape varieties planted in Bordeaux vineyard and consequently, the quality of wine. In some varietals, the attenuation of their fresh fruity character is accompanied by the accentuation of dried-fruit notes [1]. As a new adaptive strategy on climate change, some winegrowers have initiated changes in the Bordeaux blend of vine varieties [2]. This study intends to explore the fruitiness in wines produced from grape varieties adapted to the future climate of Bordeaux. 10 commercial single–varietal wines from 2018 vintage made from the main grape varieties in the Bordeaux region (Cabernet franc, Cabernet-Sauvignon and Merlot) as well as from indigenous grape varieties from the Mediterranean basin, such as Cyprus (Yiannoudin), France (Syrah), Greece (Agiorgitiko and Xinomavro), Portugal (Touriga Nacional) and Spain (Garnacha and Tempranillo), were selected among 19 samples using sensory descriptive analyses. Both sensory and instrumental analyses were coupled, to investigate their fruity aroma expression. For sensory analysis, samples were prepared from wine, using a semi preparative HPLC method which preserves wine aroma and isolates fruity characteristics in 25 specific fractions [3,4]. Fractions of interest with intense fruity aromas were sensorially selected for each wine by a trained panel and mixed with ethanol and microfiltered water to obtain fruity aromatic reconstitutions (FAR) [5]. A free sorting task was applied to categorize FAR according to their similarities or dissimilarities, and different clusters were highlighted. Instrumental analysis of the different FAR and wines demonstrated variations in their molecular composition. Results obtained from sensory and gas chromatography analysis enrich the knowledge of the fruity expression of red wines from “new” grape varieties opening up new perspectives in wine technology, including blending, thus providing new tools for producers.

Sustaining wine identity through intra-varietal diversification

With contemporary climate change, cultivated Vitis vinifera L. is at risk as climate is a critical component in defining ecologically fitted plant materiel. While winegrowers can draw on the rich diversity among grapevine varieties to limit expected impacts (Morales-Castilla et al., 2020), replacing a signature variety that has created a sense of local distinctiveness may lead to several challenges. In order to sustain wine identity in uncertain climate outcomes, the study of intra-varietal diversity is important to reflect the adaptive and evolutionary potential of current cultivated varieties. The aim of this ongoing study is to understand to what extent can intra-varietal diversity be a climate change adaptation solution. With a focus on early (Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, Grolleau, Pinot noir) to moderate late (Chenin, Petit Verdot, Cabernet franc) ripening varieties, data was collected for flowering and veraison for the various studied accessions (from conservatory plots) and clones. For these phenological growing stages, heat requirements were established using nearby weather stations (adapted from the GFV model, Parker et al., 2013) and model performances were verified. Climate change projections were then integrated to predict the future behaviour of the intra-varietal diversity. Study findings highlight the strong phenotypic diversity of studied varieties and the importance of diversification to enhance climate change resilience. While model performances may require improvements, this study is the first step towards quantifying heat requirements of different clones and how they can provide adaptation solutions for winegrowers to sustain local wine identity in a global changing climate. As genetic diversity is an ongoing process through point mutations and epigenetic adaptations, perspective work is to explore clonal data from a wide variety of geographic locations.

Differential responses of red and white grape cultivars trained to a single trellis system – the VSP

Commercial grape production relies on training grapevine cultivars onto a variety of trellis systems. Training allows for well-lit leaves and clusters, maximizing fruit quality in addition to facilitating cultivation, harvesting, and diseases control. Although grapevines can be trained onto an infinite variety of trellis systems, most red and white cultivars are trained to the standard VSP (Vertical Shoot Positioning) system. However, red and white cultivars respond differently to VSP in fruit composition and growth characteristics, which are yet to be fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the influence of the VSP trellis system on fruit composition of three red, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Syrah, and three white, Chardonnay, Riesling, and Gewurztraminer cultivars grown under uniform growing conditions in the same vineyard. All cultivars were monitored for maturity and harvested at their physiologically maximum possible sugar concentration to compare various fruit quality attributes such as Brix, pH, TA, malic and tartaric acids, glucose and fructose, potassium, YAN, and phenolic compounds including total anthocyanins, anthocyanin profile, and tannins. A distinct pattern in fruit composition was observed in each cultivar. In regards to growth characteristics, Syrah grew vigorously with the highest cluster weight. Although all cultivars developed pyriform seeds, the seed size and weight varied among all cultivars. Also varied were mesocarp cell viability, brush morphology, and cane structure. This knowledge of the canopy architectural characteristics assessed by the widely employed fruit compositional attributes and growth characteristics will aid the growers in better management of the vines in varied situations.

Grapevine yield estimation in a context of climate change: the GraY model

Grapevine yield is a key indicator to assess the impacts of climate change and the relevance of adaptation strategies in a vineyard landscape. At this scale, a yield model should use a number of parameters and input data in relation to the information available and be able to reproduce vineyard management decisions (e.g. soil and canopy management, irrigation). In this study, we used data from six experimental sites in Southern France (cv. Syrah) to calibrate a model of grapevine yield limited by water constraint (GraY). Each yield component (bud fertility, number of berries per bunch, berry weight) was calculated as a function of the soil water availability simulated by the WaLIS water balance model at critical phenological phases. The model was then evaluated in 10 grapegrowers’ plots, covering a diversity of biophysical and technical contexts (soil type, canopy size, irrigation, cover crop). We identified three critical periods for yield formation: after flowering on the previous year for the number of bunches and berries, around pre-veraison and post-veraison of the same year for mean berry weight. Yields were simulated with a model efficiency (EF) of 0.62 (NRMSE = 0.28). Bud fertility and number of berries per bunch were more accurately simulated (EF = 0.90 and 0.77, NRMSE = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively) than berry weight (EF = -0.31, NRMSE = 0.17). Model efficiency on the on-farm plots reached 0.71 (NRMSE = 0.37) simulating yields from 1 to 8 kg/plant. The GraY model is an original model estimating grapevine yield evolution on the basis of water availability under future climatic conditions.  It allows to evaluate the effects of various adaptation levers such as planting density, cover crop management, fruit/leaf ratio, shading and irrigation, in various production contexts.

Updating the Winkler index: An analysis of Cabernet sauvignon in Napa Valley’s varied and changing climate

This study aims to create an updated, agile viticultural climate index (similar to the Winkler Index) by performing in-depth analyses of current and historical data from industry partners in several major winegrowing regions. The Winkler Index was developed in the early twentieth century based on analysis of various grape-growing regions in California. The index uses heat accumulation (i.e. Growing Degree Days) throughout the growing season to determine which grape varieties are best suited to each region. As viticultural regions are increasingly subject to the complexity and uncertainty of a changing climate, a more rigorous, agile model is needed to aid grape growers in determining which cultivars to plant where. For the first phase of this study, 21 industry partners throughout Napa Valley shared historical phenology, harvest, viticultural practice, and weather data related to their Cabernet sauvignon vineyard blocks. To complement this data, berry samples were collected throughout the 2021 growing season from 50 vineyard blocks located throughout 16 American Viticultural Areas that were then analyzed for basic berry chemistry and phenolics. These blocks have been mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS), enabling analysis of altitude, vineyard row orientation, slope, and remotely sensed climate data. Sampling sites were also chosen based on their proximity to a weather station. By analyzing historical data from industry partners and data specifically collected for this study, it is possible to identify key parameters for further analysis. Initial results indicate extreme variability at a high spatial resolution not currently accounted for in modern viticultural climate indices and suggest that viticultural practices play a major role. Using the structure of data collection and analyses developed for the first phase, this project will soon be expanded to other wine regions globally, while continuing data collection in Napa Valley.